ljg-roundtable

To run a structured roundtable debate, specify your topic and the skill selects 3–5 real representative figures with distinct stances, then facilitates dialectical turn-taking to synthesize multi-perspective reasoning into an archived markdown summary.

Dialectical reasoning is a truth-seeking method where opposing perspectives challenge each other iteratively. You need it when a topic requires multi-perspective exploration to reveal deeper synthesis rather than settling for a single shallow answer.

Yes, multi-perspective debate is designed for knowledge synthesis. By assigning distinct stances to historical or contemporary figures, it creates real tension that extracts per-round controversies and maps them into a global knowledge network.

To archive a debate discussion to your Obsidian inbox, the skill automatically generates a structured markdown file featuring an ASCII framework map and unresolved questions, saving it directly to your specified Obsidian inbox path.

No, this roundtable discussion tool requires zero external dependencies or APIs. It runs entirely self-contained, using internal reasoning to select real representative figures and manage conversational dynamics.

The best way to map arguments is through meta-structured reasoning, which produces per-round controversy extraction, an ASCII framework map, and a next-level guiding question to visualize the dialectical tension and unresolved inquiry.