llm-eval-scaffolder

Build automated LLM evaluation pipelines with test cases and CI integration.

Updated Jan 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/saddam-eng-tech/ai-agent-skills --skill llm-eval-scaffolder
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: llm-eval-scaffolder
Source: https://github.com/saddam-eng-tech/ai-agent-skills/tree/main/llm-eval-scaffolder
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/saddam-eng-tech/ai-agent-skills --skill llm-eval-scaffolder

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires anthropic, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of evaluating LLM prompts, ensuring their quality and preventing regressions before they impact production.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Test Cases: Generates diverse test cases (golden, edge, adversarial, etc.) for comprehensive evaluation.
  • LLM-as-Judge Prompt: Creates a prompt for an LLM to act as a judge, scoring responses based on a defined rubric.
  • Automated Scoring: Includes a Python script to run evaluations and calculate pass/fail rates.
  • CI Integration: Sets up a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically run evaluations on code changes.
  • Use Case: When you update a prompt for a customer support chatbot, this skill ensures the new prompt doesn't degrade response quality on critical test cases.

Quick Start

Use the llm-eval-scaffolder skill to set up an LLM evaluation pipeline for my new summarization prompt.

Frequently Asked Questions about llm-eval-scaffolder

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate LLM prompt evaluation in CI?

Automate LLM prompt evaluation in CI by generating structured test cases, running an LLM-as-judge script to score responses, and executing the pipeline via GitHub Actions to catch regressions on code changes.

How does an LLM-as-judge pipeline prevent prompt regressions?

An LLM-as-judge pipeline prevents prompt regressions by scoring new prompt outputs against a defined rubric using structured test cases, calculating pass/fail rates before production deployment.

Do I need the Anthropic API to run automated LLM evaluation pipelines?

Yes, you need the Anthropic API along with Python to execute the automated LLM evaluation pipelines and calculate scoring metrics for tasks like summarization and classification.

What is the best way to test prompt quality for a customer support chatbot?

The best way to test prompt quality is generating diverse test cases, including edge and adversarial scenarios, then evaluating responses with an LLM-as-judge to ensure new prompts do not degrade critical interactions.

Can I use GitHub Actions to run LLM evaluations automatically?

Yes, you can integrate GitHub Actions to automatically run LLM evaluations on code changes, ensuring that prompt updates are continuously scored against structured test cases to prevent quality degradation.

What types of test cases are needed for comprehensive prompt evaluation?

Comprehensive prompt evaluation requires structured test cases including golden, edge, and adversarial scenarios to thoroughly assess response quality across summarization, classification, and generation tasks.