llm-evaluation

Evaluate LLM applications with automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking.

3|Updated Jan 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DrLuggels/my_dhbw --skill llm-evaluation-drluggels
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: llm-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/DrLuggels/my_dhbw/tree/main/.claude/plugins/llm-application-dev/skills/llm-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DrLuggels/my_dhbw --skill llm-evaluation-drluggels

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires nltk, rouge-score, bert-score, transformers, detoxify, anthropic, pydantic, langsmith, scipy, numpy, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), ensuring quality, reliability, and effectiveness in AI applications.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Metrics: Utilize metrics like BLEU, ROUGE, and BERTScore for quantitative analysis.
  • Human Evaluation: Incorporate human judgment for nuanced quality assessment.
  • LLM-as-Judge: Leverage powerful LLMs to evaluate responses objectively.
  • A/B Testing & Regression: Statistically compare model variants and detect performance degradation.
  • Use Case: Before deploying a new version of your chatbot, use this Skill to run automated metrics and a small human evaluation study to ensure its performance has not regressed and meets quality standards.

Quick Start

Use the llm-evaluation skill to evaluate your model's performance using accuracy, BLEU, and BERTScore metrics on a given set of test cases.

Frequently Asked Questions about llm-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate LLM performance using automated metrics?

Evaluate LLM performance by calculating automated metrics like BLEU, ROUGE, and BERTScore on your test cases. This framework automates these quantitative measurements to provide immediate numerical analysis of text generation quality.

What is the LLM-as-Judge pattern for quality assurance?

The LLM-as-Judge pattern leverages powerful LLMs to objectively evaluate model responses. This approach scales up quality measurement and assessment without requiring extensive manual human evaluation for every test case.

How do I set up LLM benchmarking and regression testing?

Set up LLM benchmarking by statistically comparing model variants to detect performance degradation. This framework provides A/B testing and regression capabilities to ensure new chatbot deployments do not regress in quality.

Does this evaluation framework support RAG and classification tasks?

Yes, this evaluation framework supports text generation, classification, and RAG evaluation. It provides detailed metric implementations tailored for these specific use cases to measure accuracy and response effectiveness.

Can I use BERTScore and ROUGE together for text generation evaluation?

Yes, you can use BERTScore and ROUGE together for text generation evaluation. The framework integrates both metrics, allowing you to combine semantic similarity scores with n-gram overlap analysis for comprehensive testing.

When should I use human evaluation over automated LLM metrics?

Use human evaluation over automated LLM metrics when you need nuanced quality assessment that quantitative scores cannot capture. This framework facilitates incorporating human judgment alongside automated metrics for robust evaluation.