llm-evaluation

Quantify LLM performance using automated metrics and human feedback.

1|Updated Apr 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/haxlys/skills --skill llm-evaluation-haxlys
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: llm-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/haxlys/skills/tree/main/vendored/wshobson-agents/plugins/llm-application-dev/skills/llm-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/haxlys/skills --skill llm-evaluation-haxlys

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Identify and quantify the performance and reliability of LLM-driven systems by combining automated metrics with human judgment to establish trustworthy benchmarks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated metrics: BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, BERTScore, perplexity, and retrieval metrics for evaluation.
  • Human evaluation: multidimensional scoring (accuracy, relevance, coherence, safety) and error analysis for real-world prompts.
  • LLM-as-Judge and benchmarking: compare models and prompts using structured evaluation pipelines and reference-based scoring.
  • Use Case: benchmark a new model against a baseline across a suite of tasks and iterate based on results.

Quick Start

Run a baseline evaluation by feeding your model's predictions for a predefined test set and review the aggregated metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions about llm-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate LLM performance using automated metrics and human evaluation?

To evaluate LLM performance, you feed your model's predictions into a predefined test set to calculate automated metrics like BLEU and BERTScore, then apply multidimensional human scoring for accuracy and relevance.

What automated metrics are used for benchmarking LLM applications?

Benchmarking LLM applications utilizes automated metrics including BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, BERTScore, perplexity, and retrieval metrics to quantify model performance and enable reproducible comparisons across prompts.

How does LLM-as-Judge work for model comparisons?

LLM-as-Judge works by using structured evaluation pipelines and reference-based scoring to compare different models and prompts, establishing trustworthy benchmarks through automated assessments combined with human judgment.

Can I monitor LLM quality over time using human evaluation frameworks?

Yes, you can monitor LLM quality over time by repeatedly applying human evaluation frameworks that perform multidimensional scoring and error analysis on real-world prompts to track reliability.

What is the best way to benchmark a new model against a baseline?

The best way to benchmark a new model against a baseline is running its predictions through structured evaluation pipelines to compute automated metrics, followed by human evaluation for comprehensive error analysis.