What problem does it solve?
Verifying that a finished code change actually delivers its intended business outcome is hard: reviewers often miss regressions, accept unproven claims, or drift into unrelated code audits. This Skill enforces a scoped, evidence-driven delivery review that proves or disproves release readiness.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Scoped Change Review: Traces every task requirement and acceptance criterion to concrete implementation and behavioral evidence, marking each COMPLETE, DEVIATED, OMITTED, or UNPROVEN.
- Independent Review Panel: Coordinates Six Thinking Hats lenses plus risk-triggered specialists (security, data, API, tests, UI, operations) as read-only subagents within a strict two-round budget.
- Structured Verdict Report: Produces a PASS, CONCERNS, FAIL, or BLOCKED verdict with prioritized findings (P0-P3), test and documentation actions, and residual risks.
- Use Case: After a developer finishes a feature branch, run this Skill before merge to verify acceptance criteria, detect change-caused defects, check contract compatibility, and confirm tests and docs are correct.
Quick Start
Review the completed changes on this branch against the task requirements and acceptance criteria, then give me a verdict with evidence.