skills.rest
0xtaoist
0xtaoistCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

ln-402-task-reviewer

Review task implementations for quality, standards, and test coverage.

Updated Mar 14, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#quality-assurance#code-review#bug-tracking#safety-checks#task-review#ac-validation
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate --skill ln-402-task-reviewer-0xtaoist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ln-402-task-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate/tree/main/ln-402-task-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate --skill ln-402-task-reviewer-0xtaoist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviews and assures quality for a single task implementation, enforcing standards, tests, and safety checks, while surfacing actionable fixes and rework notes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mandatory post-task review to decide Done or To Rework with explicit fixes.
  • AC validation via the ac_validation_checklist ensuring completeness, specificity, dependencies, and DB scope.
  • Side-effect detection that creates separate [BUG] tasks for issues found outside the current task's scope.
  • Mechanical verification (lint/typecheck) run when the task is Done to ensure pipeline safety.
  • Comprehensive plan-context loading including task and parent Story to verify alignment and traceability.

Quick Start

Provide a taskId to initiate the post-task review, and the skill will load context, apply checks, and return a Done or To Rework decision with recommended fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about ln-402-task-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review and quality checks for a single task implementation?▼

Automated task quality review loads the task context and parent Story, applies architecture and documentation checks, validates acceptance criteria, and returns a Done or To Rework decision with explicit fixes.

What is the best way to track side-effect bugs found during a code review?▼

Side-effect bug tracking during code review identifies issues outside the current task scope and automatically generates separate [BUG] tasks to flag them for resolution.

How do I validate acceptance criteria and destructive-operation guards before marking a task as Done?▼

AC validation and safety checks ensure completeness, specificity, and DB scope, while enforcing destructive-operation guards to verify pipeline safety before a task is marked Done.

Can I run mechanical verification like lint and typecheck during automated task review?▼

Mechanical verification runs lint and typecheck when the automated task review decides a task is Done, ensuring code standards and pipeline safety are met.

Does automated task review require loading the parent Story context?▼

Automated task review requires loading the task context and its parent Story to verify alignment, traceability, and comprehensive plan context before applying quality gates.

What happens if a task fails safety and quality gates during automated review?▼

When a task fails safety and quality gates, the automated review returns a To Rework decision with explicit fixes and recommended rework notes to address the identified issues.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
thavirak-svaythavirak-svay
1

bmad-dev-story

Automate software development story implementation from a context-filled spec file.

Community
Advanced
AnveioAnveio
1

task-verification-pipeline

Run and debug repository verification pipelines with ./verify.sh and E2E modes.

Community
Intermediate
cbbkrd-techcbbkrd-tech

ln-402-task-reviewer

Review task implementations for quality, standards, and test coverage.

Community
Advanced
CaseyHaralsonCaseyHaralson
7

orrery-verify

Automate testing, linting, and validation for software projects.

Community
Intermediate