ln-511-code-quality-checker

Calculate code quality metrics and validate issues with MCP Ref checks.

Updated Mar 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate --skill ln-511-code-quality-checker-0xtaoist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ln-511-code-quality-checker
Source: https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate/tree/main/ln-511-code-quality-checker
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate --skill ln-511-code-quality-checker-0xtaoist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides objective metrics and MCP Ref-guided assessments to surface code quality and architectural concerns early in the development process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Calculates cyclomatic complexity, function size, file size, nesting depth, and parameter counts to surface maintainability risks.
  • Validates architecture and best practices through MCP Ref checks (Optimality, Best Practices, Performance) and flags issues with standardized prefixes like OPT-, BP-, PERF-, ARCH-, MNT-.
  • Produces a final, score-based verdict along with a structured list of issues for review during code reviews or pre-merge checks.

Quick Start

Run this skill against your repository to generate a code quality score and detailed issues report.

Frequently Asked Questions about ln-511-code-quality-checker

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does static analysis calculate cyclomatic complexity and architecture issues?

Static analysis validates architecture and best practices through MCP Ref checks, calculating cyclomatic complexity, function size, and nesting depth to surface maintainability risks with standardized OPT-, BP-, PERF-, ARCH-, and MNT- issue prefixes.

Can I use MCP Ref validation to score architecture and best practices violations?

Scoring applies predefined metrics and MCP Ref validations to completed tasks, producing a final score-based verdict alongside a structured list of architecture, performance, and maintainability issues for review.

Does code quality scoring work with completed project tasks without external dependencies?

MCP Ref validation works with completed project tasks, applying predefined metrics and static analysis to generate a final score and actionable issues without requiring external dependencies.

What issues are flagged by static analysis during code quality scoring?

Static analysis generates a final verdict with a score and a structured list of actionable issues flagged by OPT-, BP-, PERF-, ARCH-, and MNT- prefixes for immediate review.