ln-600-docs-auditor

Audit project documentation quality across eight categories with compliance scores.

Updated Mar 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cbbkrd-tech/jl-finishes --skill ln-600-docs-auditor-cbbkrd-tech
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ln-600-docs-auditor
Source: https://github.com/cbbkrd-tech/jl-finishes/tree/main/.claude/skills/ln-600-docs-auditor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cbbkrd-tech/jl-finishes --skill ln-600-docs-auditor-cbbkrd-tech

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the challenge of maintaining high-quality, accurate, and concise project documentation by providing a systematic audit process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Auditing: Evaluates documentation across 8 critical categories including Hierarchy, Single Source of Truth, Compression, Requirements, Actuality, Legacy, Stack Adaptation, and Semantic Content.
  • Automated Scoring: Generates a compliance score out of 10 for each category and an overall score.
  • Actionable Insights: Provides detailed findings and recommended actions for improvement.
  • Use Case: After a major documentation update, run this Skill to ensure all changes adhere to quality standards, identify any new inconsistencies, and verify that the documentation accurately reflects the current codebase.

Quick Start

Use the ln-600-docs-auditor skill to audit the documentation quality of the current project.

Frequently Asked Questions about ln-600-docs-auditor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit project documentation quality systematically?

Auditing project documentation quality systematically involves evaluating it against eight categories: Hierarchy, Single Source of Truth, Compression, Requirements, Actuality, Legacy, Stack Adaptation, and Semantic Content, generating a compliance score and actionable findings per category.

What is a single source of truth in technical writing compliance?

A single source of truth in technical writing compliance ensures that information is documented in one definitive location rather than duplicated, preventing contradictions. Auditing this category verifies that documentation strictly adheres to this centralized knowledge structure.

How do I check if my codebase documentation reflects current requirements?

Checking if codebase documentation reflects current requirements involves auditing Actuality and Requirements categories to verify alignment. This process scores the documentation out of ten, identifying legacy inconsistencies and outputting recommended actions to update the content.

Can I use an automated documentation audit for any tech stack?

You can use an automated documentation audit for any tech stack because the evaluation criteria are universally applicable. The audit comprehensively checks hierarchy, compression, and stack adaptation without relying on stack-specific dependencies, ensuring broad compatibility.

What is the best way to identify legacy inconsistencies in documentation?

The best way to identify legacy inconsistencies in documentation is to run an audit focused on the Legacy category. This flags outdated content, scores compliance out of ten, and provides recommended actions to remove or update deprecated technical writing.

Does documentation semantic verification require external delegation?

Documentation semantic verification does require external delegation to a specialized component, while the main audit handles the other seven categories. This dual-layer approach ensures deep semantic content analysis alongside standard compliance checks.