ln-624-code-quality-auditor

Identify code quality defects and generate Markdown audit reports.

Updated Mar 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate --skill ln-624-code-quality-auditor-0xtaoist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ln-624-code-quality-auditor
Source: https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate/tree/main/ln-624-code-quality-auditor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/0xtaoist/taogate --skill ln-624-code-quality-auditor-0xtaoist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code quality issues slow down development, increase bug risk, and hamper maintainability. The Code Quality Auditor identifies key defects such as cyclomatic complexity, nested control flow, long methods, god classes, and poor constants management so teams can improve code health.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated checks for cyclomatic complexity, nesting depth, long methods, and god classes.
  • Parameter and signature quality assessments, O(n²) patterns, and N+1 query risks.
  • Domain-aware reporting with location, severity, effort, and recommendations, plus a per-domain score.
  • Generates a Markdown audit report compatible with the ln-620 coordination workflow.

Quick Start

Run the Code Quality Auditor on your codebase to produce a findings report and an overall score.

Frequently Asked Questions about ln-624-code-quality-auditor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect cyclomatic complexity and deep nesting issues in my codebase?

Code quality audits detect cyclomatic complexity and deep nesting by scanning your codebase for control flow anomalies and nested blocks, generating structured findings with severity levels and precise file locations for targeted refactoring.

What are common code smells and how can I identify them automatically?

Common code smells include long methods, god classes, poor constants management, and O(n²) patterns. Automated static analysis identifies these defects by evaluating parameter quality, signature structure, and query patterns to produce a domain-aware quality score.

Can I integrate static code analysis into a CI pipeline for automated audits?

Yes, static code analysis can be integrated into CI pipelines or run as manual audits across supported languages. The audit worker produces a Markdown report with an overall score, wiring directly into existing coordination workflows for continuous code health monitoring.

How do I generate a code quality report with severity levels and recommendations?

Generate a code quality report by running an audit that evaluates complexity, nesting, and code smells. The output is a Markdown audit report containing structured findings with severity, location, effort estimates, recommendations, and a per-domain quality score.

Does the code quality auditor work across multiple programming languages?

The code quality auditor supports multiple programming languages through its static analysis engine. It applies consistent checks for complexity, nesting depth, and code smells across any language supported by the tool, delivering uniform structured findings.

What is the best way to find N+1 query risks and O(n²) patterns during a code audit?

The best way to find N+1 query risks and O(n²) patterns is through automated static analysis that evaluates data access patterns and algorithmic complexity. The auditor flags these performance defects with location, severity, and actionable recommendations.