localsetup-arbiter

Asynchronous human review for architectural choices is handled by pushing a decision plan to a pending queue, monitoring its status, and retrieving the result once approved. This prevents costly rework by capturing expert input before implementation.

A human-in-the-loop decision queue manages pending plans requiring expert approval before execution. You need it when automation must pause for architectural tradeoffs or design reviews, ensuring decisions are audited and approved asynchronously without blocking.

To push a plan for async review, you submit a frontmatter-driven plan file to the decision queue. The system then monitors status checks and retrieves responses when the human reviewer has approved or rejected the architectural choices.

No, the async review process does not block automation scripts. Decisions are pushed to a pending queue, allowing scripts to continue running while status checks monitor the queue and retrieve human review results when ready.

Yes, you can track decisions and audit statuses through a clear pending queue with notification triggers. This decision auditing tracks plans submitted for human review, ensuring architectural choices are monitored until final approval.

A queue-based async decision approval system requires manual status polling or notification triggers to retrieve results. If human reviewers are unavailable, architectural choices remain pending, potentially delaying downstream implementation workflows.