logic_check

Analyze chapter text for causality, motivation, and event progression gaps.

1|Updated Jan 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/QGG886/novel_creator --skill logic-check
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: logic_check
Source: https://github.com/QGG886/novel_creator/tree/main/.opencode/skills/logic_check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/QGG886/novel_creator --skill logic-check

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

检查章节中的逻辑漏洞,包括因果关系、行为动机、事件发展等,确保叙事一致性,发现问题并提供具体修改方案。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 因果关系检查:确保事件之间存在合理因果链条。
  • 行为动机评估:核对角色动机是否充分且合理。
  • 事件发展与推理评估:发现跳跃或不合理的推理。
  • 输出与修改建议:提供可执行的修改方案与替换文本。
  • 输入输出格式支持:接受章节文本、章节信息、已写章节及角色数据等信息,返回结构化的问题清单与修复方案。

Quick Start

将章节内容和相关信息输入系统,获取逻辑漏洞检查报告及可执行修复方案。

Frequently Asked Questions about logic_check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check a chapter for plot logic gaps and narrative inconsistencies?

To check for plot logic gaps, input your chapter text, chapter info, previously written chapters, and character data. The system evaluates causality, motivation, and event progression, returning a structured JSON report of logical coherence issues and concrete modification plans.

What is character motivation evaluation in narrative consistency checks?

Character motivation evaluation is the process of verifying that a character's actions align with their established traits and goals. It checks whether the narrative provides sufficient and reasonable motivation, flagging gaps in the logical coherence of the plot.

How do I get structured modification suggestions for plot logic issues?

You get structured modification suggestions by providing the chapter text and related context to the logic check system. It outputs a machine-readable JSON report detailing issue severities, exact locations, and executable replacement text to fix the narrative inconsistencies.

Can I check event progression and causality using previously written chapters?

Yes, you can check event progression and causality by including previously written chapters as input. This allows the system to cross-reference the current chapter against past events, ensuring the causal chain and narrative consistency remain intact across the storyline.

What is the best way to identify causality and reasoning jumps in a story outline?

The best way to identify causality and reasoning jumps is to process the chapter outline alongside the actual chapter text. This evaluates event development against the planned structure, detecting irrational inferences or missing logical links in the narrative progression.

Does the logic check report include severity levels for detected narrative issues?

Yes, the logic check report includes severity levels for detected narrative issues. The machine-readable JSON output details the status, findings, issue locations, severities, and suggested fixes, providing optional auto-fix guidance for each logical gap.