logic-check

To check if your reasoning is logically sound, you need to extract premises, test inference validity, and surface hidden assumptions to determine whether the conclusion actually follows. This process delivers a structured verdict on the argument's overall strength.

Finding hidden assumptions in a proposal involves breaking reasoning into premises, inferences, and conclusions, then identifying load-bearing unstated assumptions. This reveals specific structural weaknesses and fallacies that support the proposed plan.

Identifying logical fallacies in an argument requires extracting the argument structure and classifying each premise to test the inference chain. This detects specific fallacies and unstated assumptions, allowing you to trust or reject the conclusion with clarity.

Yes, you can audit the premise validity of a multi-step decision plan by extracting reasoning chains and classifying each individual premise. This tests whether the final conclusion actually follows from the initial steps and surfaces any invalid inferences.

The limitation of a reasoning audit is that it provides a structured logic assessment of the argument's form, but the final verdict depends entirely on the accuracy of the initial premises. It cannot generate new external facts, only evaluate the provided inference validity.