logic-check

Audit manuscripts for internal contradictions with evidence-based findings.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Werewolf-DynamiX/_New_Book_Starter_Kit --skill logic-check-werewolf-dynamix
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: logic-check
Source: https://github.com/Werewolf-DynamiX/_New_Book_Starter_Kit/tree/main/.gemini/skills/logic-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Werewolf-DynamiX/_New_Book_Starter_Kit --skill logic-check-werewolf-dynamix

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps authors and editors detect internal contradictions in manuscripts by auditing literal meaning, sequence, knowledge, and scene logic before publication.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Internal Consistency Audits: Identifies comparison errors, cause-and-effect problems, timeline issues, spatial blocking mistakes, and unsupported character knowledge.
  • Mechanical Review Protocol: Produces evidence-based findings with quotes, violation categories, and minimal suggested fixes without judging prose quality or style.
  • Use Case: Review a completed chapter before a final polish pass to find contradictions that readers may notice even when the intended meaning is clear to the author.

Quick Start

Ask the logic-check skill to audit the manuscript chapter for internal contradictions and provide a categorized consistency report.

Frequently Asked Questions about logic-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check a fiction manuscript for internal contradictions?

A manuscript logic audit detects internal contradictions by checking timelines, character knowledge, spatial consistency, and cause-effect validation, producing evidence-based findings with quotes and violation categories.

How do I find timeline and character knowledge errors during chapter revisions?

Find timeline and character knowledge errors during chapter revisions by running a mechanical review protocol that performs literal-reading logic audits to identify unsupported character knowledge and sequence inconsistencies before publication.

Does an internal consistency audit evaluate prose quality and writing style?

An internal consistency audit does not evaluate prose quality or writing style; it applies a mechanical review protocol to produce evidence-based findings with quotes, violation categories, and minimal suggested fixes for logic errors only.

What is the best way to prepare a completed chapter for a final polish pass?

The best way to prepare a completed chapter for a final polish pass is to run a logic audit to catch hidden manuscript contradictions early, ensuring spatial consistency and cause-effect validation are intact before editing prose.

Why does my manuscript need a logic audit if the intended meaning is clear to me as the author?

Your manuscript needs a logic audit because a literal-reading consistency check identifies internal contradictions and comparison errors that readers may notice even when the intended meaning is clear to the author.