skills.rest
Hjhnb-star
Hjhnb-starCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

logic-checker

Analyze CoPaper academic documents for logical fallacies and claim-evidence mismatches.

Updated Jun 18, 2026
Search Tags:#argumentation#consistency checking#academic paper#logic analysis#fallacies detection
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent --skill logic-checker
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: logic-checker
Source: https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent/tree/main/.agents/skills/logic-checker
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent --skill logic-checker

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Detects logical discrepancies, inconsistencies, and argumentation flaws in academic paper drafts, helping to maintain the paper's credibility and rigor.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Logical Discrepancy Detection: Identifies claim-evidence mismatches, contradictions, and argumentation flaws.
  • Consistency Validation: Ensures abstract claims align with the body content and methodology matches results.
  • Use Case: For an AI assistant reviewing a draft paper on AI ethics, the skill would highlight logical gaps or fallacies, ensuring the paper's arguments are sound.

Quick Start

Run the logic-checker skill on the academic paper draft 'ai_ethics_paper.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about logic-checker

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check my academic paper for logical fallacies and consistency?▼

You can check an academic paper for logical fallacies by analyzing the document for claim-evidence mismatches and argumentation flaws. This skill processes structured drafts to detect contradictions and validate logical consistency.

What is CoPaper format and why is it needed for logic analysis?▼

CoPaper format is a structured document layout required for logic analysis. Your academic paper must be in this format to process the text and validate that abstract claims align with body content and methodology.

How do I detect contradictions between my abstract and paper methodology?▼

To detect contradictions between your abstract and methodology, run a consistency validation on the structured document. The checker verifies that abstract claims align with body content and methodology matches results.

Can I use this to find claim-evidence mismatches in any document draft?▼

No, finding claim-evidence mismatches is restricted to CoPaper structured documents. The argumentation analysis requires this specific format to parse claims, validate evidence alignment, and detect logical fallacies.

What types of argumentation flaws and logical discrepancies can be detected?▼

Detectable argumentation flaws include claim-evidence mismatches, internal contradictions, and logical fallacies. The analysis ensures abstract claims align with body content and methodology matches results to maintain credibility.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
PKU-ASALPKU-ASAL
43

pdf2paper

Convert PDF documents into structured paper.md sections incrementally.

Official
Intermediate
PKU-ASALPKU-ASAL
43

logic-checker

Detect logical discrepancies in academic paper drafts using paper.md and state.json.

Official
Advanced
syahrilTGRsyahrilTGR
3

academic-research-writer

Generate academic research documents with IEEE citation formatting and verified sources.

Community
Advanced
Eric-Pacheco95Eric-Pacheco95

analyze-claims

Analyze claims and evidence in text using Python.

Community
Advanced