skills.rest
human-avatar
human-avatarOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

logic-council

Validate arguments through five reasoning frameworks and synthesize a verdict.

212|23|Updated May 23, 2026
Search Tags:#reasoning#systems thinking#decision support#argument analysis#peer review#bayesian#adversarial critique
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity --skill logic-council
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: logic-council
Source: https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/tree/main/skills/logic-council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity --skill logic-council

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The logic-council skill helps you validate whether your argument, plan, or decision logic actually holds up by running it through multiple distinct reasoning frameworks and synthesizing the strongest failures and fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-framework peer review: Formal logic, systems thinking, Bayesian reasoning, first principles, and adversarial logic each analyze the same reasoning from different failure modes.
  • Structured verdict synthesis: Produces a clear verdict covering where frameworks agree, where they diverge, the single strongest objection, and what to change to make the reasoning sound.
  • Trigger-based activation for reasoning audits: Best for complex arguments where the conclusion matters, plans with non-obvious dependencies, and decisions you want stress-tested for soundness.
  • Adjustable council depth: Lets the user choose full council, chair-only synthesis, strongest-objection-only, or reframe before running.

Quick Start

Run the logic council on your reasoning by saying: "Run the logic council on whether my conclusion follows from these premises: [paste your reasoning]."

Frequently Asked Questions about logic-council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test my decision reasoning for hidden assumptions and invalid inferences?▼

A logical peer review validates argument soundness by spawning five independent framework analyses—formal logic, systems thinking, Bayesian reasoning, first principles, and adversarial logic—followed by a chair-synthesized verdict highlighting failures and fixes.

Can I check if my plan accounts for missing second- and third-order effects?▼

Systems thinking and adversarial logic frameworks evaluate your plan to identify missing second- and third-order effects, ensuring non-obvious dependencies and structural flaws are exposed before finalizing the decision.

What is the best way to find the strongest counter-argument to my position?▼

Adversarial critique isolates the single strongest counter-argument to your position, feeding it into a chair-synthesized verdict that pinpoints where frameworks diverge and outlines concrete repairs.

How do I validate Bayesian reasoning and uncertainty calibration in my argument?▼

Submit your framed claim and premises to a Bayesian framework analysis to detect miscalibrated uncertainty, evaluating the probability logic of your conclusions and feeding the findings into a peer-review pass.

When should I avoid using a multi-framework logic council?▼

Avoid using a multi-framework logic council for simple or low-stakes arguments; spawning five independent framework analyses is designed specifically for complex, high-stakes reasoning that requires deep stress-testing and peer review.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
indranildchandraindranildchandra
13

review-council

Compose a multi-persona advisory council to critique architecture and design decisions.

Community
Advanced
human-avatarhuman-avatar
212

writing-argument

Audit persuasive arguments by making warrants explicit and evaluating evidence quality.

Official
Intermediate
57uff3r57uff3r
7

akorchak:forecast

Generate quantified probability estimates for future events using Bayesian reasoning.

Community
Advanced
Steffen025Steffen025
186

RedTeam

Orchestrate 32 agents to critique arguments and produce steelman and counter-arguments.

Community
Advanced