Map argument structures, identifying premises, conclusions, inference chains, and logical gaps.
npx skills add https://github.com/TylerGarlick/abraxas --skill logos
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: logos Source: https://github.com/TylerGarlick/abraxas/tree/main/skills/logos Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TylerGarlick/abraxas --skill logos
This Skill tackles the problem of invisible structural weakness in arguments, where LLMs generate confident conclusions from flawed reasoning, missing premises, or hidden assumptions. It makes argument structure visible for analysis.
Use the logos skill to map the argument structure of the following claim: "The sky is blue because of Rayleigh scattering."
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Argument mapping visualizes premises, conclusions, and inference chains to expose hidden assumptions. By dissecting the logical structure, you can identify unstated premises and logical gaps that weaken the overall reasoning of a claim before accepting it.
Falsification testing actively seeks conditions that would disprove an argument. It serves as a pre-analysis layer for adversarial testing, ensuring logical soundness and testability by identifying the weakest points where a claim might fail under scrutiny.
Identifying logical gaps requires analyzing inference chains to uncover missing evidence and unstated assumptions. Gap analysis isolates structural weaknesses where conclusions are generated from flawed reasoning, making the argument's logical leaps visible for correction.
Fallacy detection is supported through structural argument mapping and gap analysis. By breaking down premises and inference chains, the mechanism surfaces logical leaps and missing evidence, acting as a pre-analysis layer to ensure claims are logically sound.
Argument mapping suits debate preparation by dissecting complex claims into premises, conclusions, and hidden assumptions. It provides epistemic labeling and falsification testing to ensure the logical integrity of positions before engaging in adversarial debate scenarios.
juanandresgsGenerate traceable content snapshots with verbatim quotes and structural outlines.
xlelibertySolve IMO, Putnam, and USAMO problems via adversarial proof verification.
sammcjAnalyze written content for logical fallacies, hidden assumptions, and evidence quality.
sandraschiEvaluate logical arguments for validity, soundness, and fallacies.
