lookahead-safety

Filter historical quant data by SEC publication timestamps to prevent look-ahead bias.

Updated Apr 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jefrnc/quant-llm-skills --skill lookahead-safety
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lookahead-safety
Source: https://github.com/jefrnc/quant-llm-skills/tree/main/skills/lookahead-safety
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jefrnc/quant-llm-skills --skill lookahead-safety

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill prevents look-ahead bias in quant research by ensuring you only use data that was actually published and therefore knowable at the time you claim to know it.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces known-date semantics: treats filing_date / acceptedDate (or equivalent publication timestamps) as the availability boundary, not period_end or other period-of-report fields.
  • Hardens SEC/XBRL workflows: avoids common SEC-specific traps like XBRL period_end leakage, filing amendments (10-K/A superseding), and unknown publication windows.
  • Improves backtest integrity: requires query_date-bounded historical reads so future records cannot contaminate past calculations, including explicit “future-data leak” testing guidance.

Quick Start

Use the lookahead-safety skill when you ask an AI to “compute metric X as of date D from SEC/XBRL/backtest data” so it filters out any records with filing_date after D and clearly states the admissibility rule.

Frequently Asked Questions about lookahead-safety

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent lookahead bias when backtesting with SEC filing data?

To prevent lookahead bias in SEC filing backtesting, you must filter data using the publication timestamp, such as filing_date or acceptedDate, rather than the accounting period_end field, ensuring only available records are used.

Why does my historical quant backtest use XBRL period_end dates incorrectly?

Using XBRL period_end dates for availability introduces lookahead bias because it ignores when data was actually published; you must use filing_date or acceptedDate as the strict boundary for historical reads.

What is point-in-time data filtering for historical quant research?

Point-in-time data filtering for quant research requires bounding historical queries by a known publication timestamp, ensuring future records cannot contaminate past calculations during backtesting.

How do I handle SEC filing amendments like 10-K/A to avoid future-data leaks?

To avoid future-data leaks from SEC filing amendments like 10-K/A, enforce strict availability filtering using publication timestamps and reject any unsafe queries where the acceptedDate or filing_date semantics are unknown.

Can I compute financial metrics as of a specific date without leaking future data?

Yes, you can compute financial metrics as of a specific date safely by requiring query_date-bounded historical reads, filtering out any records with a filing_date after your target date to block data leaks.