lq-board-document-review

Review board governance documents and produce four-category findings with tracked changes.

46|25|Updated May 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill lq-board-document-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lq-board-document-review
Source: https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills/tree/main/skills/lq-board-document-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill lq-board-document-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It turns board-level governance documents into a structured, evidence-backed set of findings that a human reviewer can approve confidently, reducing the risk of governance gaps and inconsistent drafting.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four-category governance review: defined terms, cross-references, narrative vs matrix/schedule consistency, and governance red flags.
  • Traceability-first outputs: every finding must cite the exact section/schedule row/cell location, not paraphrased assertions.
  • Board-ready remediation artifacts: tracked Word changes, an Excel Reconciliation Log, and an optional PowerPoint findings slide (only with a provided deck template).
  • Privilege and safety guardrails: treats outputs as privileged governance work product and requires explicit confirmation before any external/network/tool actions.

Quick Start

Use lq-board-document-review on your uploaded board governance Word document (and the companion Authority Matrix/Excel and PowerPoint template if you want slide output) to produce category-based findings with tracked changes and a reconciliation log.

Frequently Asked Questions about lq-board-document-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a board charter for governance red flags and cross-reference errors?

Reviewing a board charter involves locating defined terms, validating cross-references, reconciling narrative against an authority matrix, and flagging governance red flags to produce structured, traceable findings with exact section and schedule citations.

What is the best way to reconcile delegation of authority policies against an Excel authority matrix?

Reconciling delegation of authority policies requires validating the narrative document against the companion Excel matrix, identifying inconsistencies, and generating a reconciliation log with tracked-change amendments for board-level governance review.

Can I generate a PowerPoint findings slide from my board resolution review?

Generating a PowerPoint findings slide is possible only when a deck template is provided alongside the principal Word input and companion Excel, ensuring board-ready remediation artifacts with structured governance findings.

Does board document review work with incomplete or truncated source files?

Board document review mandates tracked-change amendments and explicitly does not silently accept incomplete or truncated documents, requiring complete principal Word input plus company, jurisdiction, and effective-date context.

How do I ensure defined terms in committee terms of reference are validated with traceable citations?

Validating defined terms requires a traceability-first approach that cites exact section, schedule row, or cell locations rather than paraphrased assertions, producing evidence-backed governance findings for committee terms of reference.