ls-agentic-umbrella-queue

Enforce scope-aware umbrella workflows with explicit user confirmation before destructive actions.

3|2|Updated Dec 25, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/CruxExperts/localsetup --skill ls-agentic-umbrella-queue
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ls-agentic-umbrella-queue
Source: https://github.com/CruxExperts/localsetup/tree/main/_localsetup/skills/ls-agentic-umbrella-queue
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/CruxExperts/localsetup --skill ls-agentic-umbrella-queue

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Umbrella queue governance requires guardrails to prevent risky changes and ensure deliberate actions. This Skill provides scope-aware checks and explicit user confirmations before executing umbrella or queue-related workflows.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Scope-aware umbrella execution with named workflows
  • Impact summaries and explicit confirmation prompts before big or destructive runs
  • Clear guidance when editing .agent/queue/, .agent/, PRD.md, or named umbrella references

Quick Start

When ready, invoke a named umbrella workflow to perform the guarded action with explicit user confirmation.

Frequently Asked Questions about ls-agentic-umbrella-queue

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I add user confirmation prompts to an umbrella workflow?

To add user confirmation prompts to an umbrella workflow, you need a scope-aware governance mechanism that generates impact summaries and requires explicit approval before executing destructive or risky queue file changes.

What are guardrails for editing queue files and PRD references?

Guardrails for editing queue files and PRD references are scope checks that prevent accidental destructive actions by enforcing explicit confirmation prompts before any potentially risky modifications are applied.

How do I execute named umbrella workflows safely?

You execute named umbrella workflows safely by invoking them through a guarded process that presents an impact summary and waits for explicit user confirmation before performing the actual workflow operations.

Do I need scope checks for destructive agent queue updates?

Yes, you need scope checks for destructive agent queue updates to ensure deliberate actions, prevent unintended modifications to .agent/queue paths, and gate impactful changes with user confirmations.

When should I use confirmation gates in an umbrella workflow?

You should use confirmation gates in an umbrella workflow whenever an operation involves editing .agent/queue files, modifying PRD.md, or invoking named workflows that could result in big or destructive runs.

What is the best way to prevent risky changes in umbrella queue governance?

The best way to prevent risky changes in umbrella queue governance is to enforce scope-aware guardrails that require explicit user confirmation and provide clear impact summaries before executing any impactful actions.