skills.rest
tronghieu
tronghieuCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

lumi-verify

Verify Lumina-Wiki sources notes against cited raw artifacts with reviewer triage.

36|16|Updated May 1, 2026
Search Tags:#fact-checking#knowledge graph#data integrity#web verification#source-grounding#wiki governance
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tronghieu/lumina-wiki --skill lumi-verify
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lumi-verify
Source: https://github.com/tronghieu/lumina-wiki/tree/main/src/skills/core/verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tronghieu/lumina-wiki --skill lumi-verify

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It prevents your Lumina-Wiki from drifting into unsourced or contradictory claims by auditing each sources/* entry against the raw artifacts it cites.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Semantic integrity checking: Detects fabricated or drifted statements within wiki/sources/* by comparing claims to cited raw files.
  • Multi-reviewer verification: Runs a Blind reviewer (no provenance context), a Grounding reviewer (raw + graph context), and an optional External reviewer (open-web check).
  • Safe, audit-friendly reporting: Flags issues by writing only to frontmatter (never auto-edits the wiki body), with timestamped run reports for review.

Quick Start

Run verification for one entry by asking the agent: /lumi-verify <slug>.

Frequently Asked Questions about lumi-verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify wiki claims against their original sources to prevent content drift?▼

To verify wiki claims against their sources, you audit each wiki entry by comparing its statements to the cited raw artifacts, detecting fabricated or drifted content through semantic integrity checking and multi-reviewer cross-referencing.

What is the best way to audit a knowledge graph for data integrity and unsourced claims?▼

Auditing a knowledge graph for data integrity requires running whole-wiki checks that apply provenance gating and claim triage. This process flags unsourced or contradictory claims by comparing wiki notes against raw artifacts using multiple verification reviewers.

How does multi-reviewer fact-checking work for wiki governance?▼

Multi-reviewer fact-checking for wiki governance runs a Blind reviewer without provenance context, a Grounding reviewer with raw and graph context, and an optional External reviewer for open-web checks, ensuring comprehensive semantic validation of claims against sources.

Can I perform a time-bounded verification of wiki sources using only specific recent updates?▼

Yes, you can perform time-bounded verification of wiki sources by running checks with time constraints. This audits only recently updated entries against their cited raw artifacts, optionally including external web review, to ensure recent changes maintain source-grounding.

Does wiki verification automatically edit the wiki body when it finds contradictory claims?▼

No, wiki verification does not auto-edit the wiki body when it finds contradictory claims. It operates in a safe, audit-friendly manner by flagging issues only through wiki frontmatter and generating timestamped JSON reports for manual review.

Related Skills

Explore More Legal & Compliance Skills→
ce-dot-netce-dot-net
3

ACE Learning from Execution

Capture insights from task executions into a persistent knowledge base.

Official
Intermediate
KITTranKITTran

exp-eval

Evaluate completed experiments and update wiki knowledge graphs with verdicts.

Community
Advanced
ethan-rioethan-rio

synthesize-wiki

Convert source notes and knowledge graph data into grounded wiki notes.

Community
Intermediate
ANcpLuaANcpLua
5

epistemic-checkpoint

Verify software metadata facts via local checks and official web sources.

Community
Intermediate