luo-xiang-criminal-law-perspective

Frame criminal law concepts with Luo Xiang-inspired reasoning and safety boundaries.

114|12|Updated May 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/swaylq/master-skill --skill luo-xiang-criminal-law-perspective-swaylq
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: luo-xiang-criminal-law-perspective
Source: https://github.com/swaylq/master-skill/tree/main/prototypes/china-law-master/output/sub-skills/luo-xiang-criminal-law
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/swaylq/master-skill --skill luo-xiang-criminal-law-perspective-swaylq

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It solves the problem of turning complex criminal law concepts into a coherent way to understand cases, make safer public explanations, and reason about刑法学中的价值与哲学(without replacing professional legal advice).

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Criminal law perspective framing: Guides understanding of刑法的基础逻辑与法哲学关联,帮助用户从“为什么惩罚、谁有权惩罚、怎样才算对”切入。
  • Public legal education style: Provides 普法导向的解释方式(案例 + 故事 + 类比),避免术语堆砌,同时强调普法≠个案法律意见。
  • Decision guidance with safety boundaries: Uses structured decision rules to steer different intents(学刑法基础、法考备考、法律哲学、刑辩/司法实务思考)到对应学习路径与表达边界。

Quick Start

Ask an AI agent to explain a刑事法律疑问 using “罗翔框架(圆圈正义 + 普法使命 + 刑法学的哲学人性 + 谦卑自省)”,并在结尾明确提醒“这不是个案法律意见,需持证律师面询”。

Frequently Asked Questions about luo-xiang-criminal-law-perspective

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I explain criminal law concepts to the public without giving case-specific legal advice?

To explain criminal law safely, use a public education framework combining cases and analogies while explicitly stating this is not case-specific legal advice. This ensures conceptual clarity for audiences while maintaining strict boundaries against unauthorized legal practice.

What is the Luo Xiang framework for understanding criminal law philosophy?

The Luo Xiang framework approaches criminal law philosophy through circle of justice, public education mission, human nature philosophy, and humble self-reflection. It guides reasoning about why punishment exists, who holds punitive authority, and how to determine proportional justice.

Can I use this criminal law reasoning framework for exam preparation?

Yes, this framework supports criminal law exam preparation by applying structured decision rules that route exam-oriented intents to dedicated study paths. It builds conceptual clarity on legal philosophy and foundational logic required for passing legal examinations.

How does this approach handle criminal law basics learning for beginners?

For criminal law basics learning, this framework applies a public education style using cases and analogies rather than jargon stacking. It grounds beginners in foundational legal logic and philosophy connections, making entry-level criminal law concepts accessible without sacrificing accuracy.

When should I not rely on this framework for criminal law issues?

Do not use this framework for case-specific legal advice or actual criminal defense. It serves conceptual learning, public education, and professional reflection only. For individual criminal matters, you must consult a licensed attorney for proper legal guidance.