m15-anti-pattern

Identify Rust anti-patterns like clone, unwrap, and unsafe usage during code reviews.

3|Updated Feb 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aramirez087/TuitBot --skill m15-anti-pattern-aramirez087
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: m15-anti-pattern
Source: https://github.com/aramirez087/TuitBot/tree/main/.agents/skills/m15-anti-pattern
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aramirez087/TuitBot --skill m15-anti-pattern-aramirez087

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Rust reviewers often miss clones, unwraps, and other anti-patterns that mask ownership or error-handling issues, and this skill surfaces those smells along with guidance for restarting the design conversation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Anti-pattern catalog: Shows common clones, unwraps, Rc usage, unsafe blocks, and other smells with clear reasons why they hurt maintainability.
  • Trace guidance: Offers “trace up” and “trace down” prompts that connect symptoms to higher-level design skills such as ownership modeling, domain flow, or error handling.
  • Review checklist: Provides the top beginner mistakes, code smell indicators, and refactoring nudges so you can stamp out flawed patterns during peer review.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to highlight clones, unwraps, or other suspicious patterns in the Rust snippet you are reviewing.

Frequently Asked Questions about m15-anti-pattern

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify hidden Rust anti-patterns during code review?

To identify Rust anti-patterns during code review, surface clones, unwraps, Rc usage, and unsafe blocks that mask ownership or error-handling issues. The skill catalogs these smells and maps each to better patterns with clear reasons why they hurt maintainability.

What are common Rust code smells related to ownership and error handling?

Common Rust code smells include unnecessary clones, unwrap calls, Rc usage, and unsafe blocks. These patterns mask underlying ownership or error-handling issues, and recognizing them helps prevent flawed design from propagating through your codebase.

How do I trace Rust clone and unwrap usage back to design issues?

Trace Rust clone and unwrap usage back to design issues by following trace up and trace down prompts. These connect symptoms to higher-level design skills such as ownership modeling, domain flow, or error handling to restart the design conversation.

Can this skill help with reviewing unsafe blocks and Rc usage in Rust?

Yes, this skill helps review unsafe blocks and Rc usage in Rust by flagging them as suspicious patterns. It explains why these smells hurt maintainability and suggests next diagnostic steps to trace ownership, error handling, or domain issues.

What is the best way to catch beginner mistakes in Rust peer review?

The best way to catch beginner mistakes in Rust peer review is using a review checklist of top code smell indicators and refactoring nudges. This stamps out flawed patterns by highlighting clones, unwraps, and other suspicious usage during review.

When should I not use clone or unwrap in Rust code?

You should avoid clone and unwrap in Rust when they mask ownership or error-handling design issues. These patterns often indicate flawed design choices that hurt maintainability and should be traced to higher-level domain or ownership problems.