What problem does it solve?
Act as Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2 for a meta-analysis manuscript, checking rigor, reproducibility, and reporting compliance. Use when validating the final paper before submission.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Dual reviewer outputs: reviewer1.md and reviewer2.md, plus consolidated action-items and grade summaries.
- Outputs include: 08_reviews/reviewer1.md, 08_reviews/reviewer2.md, 08_reviews/action-items.md, 08_reviews/grade_summary.csv, 08_reviews/grade_summary.md, 08_reviews/analysis_stats.json (from Stage 06), 08_reviews/grade_suggestions.csv, 08_reviews/grade_suggestions.md, 08_reviews/grade_detailed.md, and 03_screening/round-01/quality_rob2.csv, 03_screening/round-01/rob2_assessment.md, 03_screening/round-01/quality_robins_i.csv, 03_screening/round-01/robins_i_assessment.md.
- Validation checks for protocol adherence, risk of bias, reporting completeness, and reproducibility.
Quick Start
Open the ma-peer-review project within the tooling environment and run the end-to-end review workflow to generate reviewer artifacts for validation.