maister:aggregate-designer

To design DDD aggregates correctly, you need a guided workflow that performs pairwise conflict analysis on state-changing commands and recommends context-appropriate locking strategies. This prevents excessive locking contention and invariant violations in concurrent systems.

The best way to identify aggregate boundaries is generating a pairwise conflict matrix to map which commands must be locked together. This structured conflict analysis uses business process sequencing and volume probes to avoid over-locking non-conflicting commands.

Handling time-range conflict traps requires a structured workflow that accounts for business process sequencing and the transitivity of command conflicts. This ensures your aggregate design applies the correct locking boundaries for time-sensitive state changes.

Yes, you can use a guided wizard for domain-driven design aggregate modeling across business domains. It walks you through 9 structured phases from command extraction to final locking strategy, handling edge cases like transitive command conflicts.

You should choose per-time-slot aggregates for high traffic booking systems to avoid unnecessary lock contention between non-overlapping reservations. A guided aggregate design wizard helps you make this decision by analyzing command conflict volumes.

Your domain model suffers from invariant violations due to incorrectly scoped consistency units that allow insufficient locking during concurrent state changes. Applying precise locking boundaries through pairwise conflict analysis resolves these invariant violations.