manuscript-review

Detect structural, logical, and citation defects in academic manuscripts.

310|45|Updated Feb 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Mathews-Tom/praxis-skills --skill manuscript-review-mathews-tom
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: manuscript-review
Source: https://github.com/Mathews-Tom/praxis-skills/tree/main/skills/manuscript-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Mathews-Tom/praxis-skills --skill manuscript-review-mathews-tom

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Comprehensive pre-publication manuscript review is time-consuming and easy to get wrong when authors are too close to their text. This Skill surfaces structural, evidentiary, and cross-element coherence defects so authors can prioritize fixes that improve clarity, credibility, and reproducibility before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-pass diagnostic audit: Systematic 13-pass scan covering structure, claims-evidence calibration, figures/tables, prose mechanics, and rendered PDF inspection.
  • Citation and provenance-aware checks: Citation hygiene, reference bijection, and optional consumption of a macro provenance manifest for numeric coherence.
  • Actionable, prioritized output: Produces a section-level, prioritized refactoring report following a 24-section checklist and a supplied report template.
  • Use Case: Submit an arXiv preprint or journal draft (PDF, DOCX, LaTeX, or Markdown) to get a prioritized, reproducibility-focused review highlighting HIGH-impact fixes.

Quick Start

Review the uploaded manuscript and produce a prioritized, section-level refactoring report in Markdown named [manuscript-name]-review-report.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about manuscript-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a pre-submission manuscript review on a preprint PDF?

Pre-submission manuscript review on a preprint PDF is performed by ingesting the file to detect structural, logical, and citation defects, producing a prioritized refactoring report based on a 24-point checklist.

Can I use a manuscript review tool to check citation hygiene and reference bijection in my LaTeX thesis?

Yes, manuscript review tools can check citation hygiene and reference bijection in a LaTeX thesis by scanning for cross-element coherence defects and consuming a macro provenance manifest for numeric coherence.

What is the best way to audit reproducibility and claims-evidence calibration in an academic manuscript?

The best way to audit reproducibility in an academic manuscript is through a multi-pass diagnostic scan that systematically evaluates claims-evidence calibration, figures, tables, and prose mechanics.

Does manuscript review work with Markdown and DOCX files or only rendered PDFs?

Manuscript review works with Markdown and DOCX files, as well as LaTeX and rendered PDFs, applying a 13-pass scan to inspect structure, logical coherence, and rendered output.

What sections does a prioritized manuscript refactoring report include?

A prioritized manuscript refactoring report includes section-level feedback conforming to a 24-section checklist, highlighting HIGH-impact fixes to improve clarity, credibility, and reproducibility.

Why does my academic manuscript need a targeted review of methods and figures before journal submission?

An academic manuscript needs a targeted review of methods and figures before journal submission to surface evidentiary and cross-element coherence defects that authors often miss when too close to the text.