manuscript-review

Detect methodological, statistical, ethical, and reporting-guideline issues in medical manuscript drafts.

11|4|Updated Nov 25, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant --skill manuscript-review-u9401066
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: manuscript-review
Source: https://github.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/tree/main/.claude/skills/manuscript-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant --skill manuscript-review-u9401066

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a structured, semantic peer-review and reporting-guideline compliance check for medical manuscript drafts, reducing manual checklist work and improving the chance of passing editorial screening.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Semantic Peer Review: Evaluates structure, methods, statistics, ethics, and writing quality and classifies findings as Major or Minor with remediation suggestions.
  • Reporting Guideline Compliance: Auto-detects study type and checks CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, or CARE items with percentage compliance and detailed item-level feedback.
  • Integrated Draft Analysis: Designed to work with MCP tools to read drafts, count words, and verify formatting across multiple files for pre-submission checks and reviewer-style reports.
  • Use Case: Run a pre-submission review of an RCT manuscript to identify missing ethics statements, randomization details, sample size justification, and CONSORT item gaps.

Quick Start

Use the manuscript-review skill to read the latest draft and produce a structured peer-review report highlighting major methodological flaws and reporting guideline gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about manuscript-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check my medical manuscript for CONSORT or STROBE compliance before submission?

To check medical manuscript compliance, the system auto-detects the study type and maps draft features to CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, or CARE items, generating a structured report with percentage compliance and item-level feedback.

What is automated peer review for reporting guidelines and how does it work?

Automated peer review for reporting guidelines evaluates medical manuscript drafts by detecting methodological, statistical, and ethical issues, then classifying findings as major or minor with remediation suggestions.

Can I simulate a peer review for a randomized trial manuscript draft?

Yes, you can simulate peer review for randomized trial manuscripts by analyzing the draft text to identify missing randomization details, ethics statements, and sample size justifications.

How do I identify missing PRISMA items in a systematic review draft?

To identify missing PRISMA items in a systematic review draft, the semantic analysis maps the manuscript text to PRISMA checklist items, highlighting gaps and calculating overall reporting compliance.

Does manuscript peer review require access to the original draft files?

Yes, manuscript peer review requires access to draft text via read_draft tools to perform word count checks, verify formatting across multiple files, and produce a structured pre-submission report.