What problem does it solve?
Provides a structured, semantic peer-review and reporting-guideline compliance check for medical manuscript drafts, reducing manual checklist work and improving the chance of passing editorial screening.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Semantic Peer Review: Evaluates structure, methods, statistics, ethics, and writing quality and classifies findings as Major or Minor with remediation suggestions.
- Reporting Guideline Compliance: Auto-detects study type and checks CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, or CARE items with percentage compliance and detailed item-level feedback.
- Integrated Draft Analysis: Designed to work with MCP tools to read drafts, count words, and verify formatting across multiple files for pre-submission checks and reviewer-style reports.
- Use Case: Run a pre-submission review of an RCT manuscript to identify missing ethics statements, randomization details, sample size justification, and CONSORT item gaps.
Quick Start
Use the manuscript-review skill to read the latest draft and produce a structured peer-review report highlighting major methodological flaws and reporting guideline gaps.