maozedong-maoxuan-skill

Analyze structural problems using a clarification-first workflow with optional HTML reports.

Updated Apr 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WishingCat/MySkills --skill maozedong-maoxuan-skill-wishingcat
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: maozedong-maoxuan-skill
Source: https://github.com/WishingCat/MySkills/tree/main/xinqingnian-maoxuan-skill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WishingCat/MySkills --skill maozedong-maoxuan-skill-wishingcat

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires pyyaml, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps you analyze complex, structure-driven real-world problems (work, collaboration, relationships, decisions, governance) by first clarifying the goal and key event, then building a structured diagnosis and actionable route—rather than repeating quotes or jumping straight to conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Clarification-first structural analysis: asks targeted questions using fixed guardrails when the input is ambiguous or incomplete.
  • Method-chain diagnosis: guides you to identify core constraints, stage/transition context, resources/support, alliances/boundaries, communication calibration, execution routes, and review loops.
  • Optional HTML deliverable: when the situation is complex (multi-person, time-line, routes), it can produce a single-file HTML report for saving and sharing.

Use cases: project stalled despite effort, team governance/governance drift, relationship boundary/conflict, self-management breakdown, major life decision comparisons, and multi-party coordination failures.

Quick Start

Tell the AI: 用毛选帮我分析为什么这个多方协作最近越推越卡,并在最后输出一份 HTML 报告。按格式补齐目标、最近关键事件、涉及人物、已做尝试、现实约束。

Frequently Asked Questions about maozedong-maoxuan-skill

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze complex real-world problems using a clarification-first workflow?

A clarification-first workflow analyzes complex real-world problems by asking targeted questions to resolve ambiguous inputs, then diagnosing core constraints, execution routes, and review loops to produce clear next actions.

What is the best way to handle multi-party collaboration conflicts and governance drift?

Handling multi-party collaboration conflicts requires identifying stage transitions, alliance boundaries, and communication calibration through structured diagnosis, which maps governance drift into actionable execution routes.

Can I generate an HTML report for structural problem solving and decision routing?

Yes, you can generate a single-file HTML report for structural problem solving when the situation involves multiple people, timelines, or decision routes, providing a shareable deliverable for complex governance analysis.

Does this structural analysis approach work for major life decision comparisons and self-management?

Structural analysis works for major life decision comparisons and self-management breakdowns by diagnosing control points, resource constraints, and execution routes to turn structural real-world problems into clear next actions.

What are the limitations of using a clarification-first method for real-world problem solving?

The clarification-first method requires fixed trigger conditions and structured restatement rules, meaning it will not proceed with analysis if input remains incomplete, ensuring risk boundaries are maintained for collaboration governance.

How to diagnose stalled project execution and relationship boundary disputes step by step?

Diagnosing stalled projects and relationship boundary disputes starts by restating goals and key events, then mapping method-chain constraints like resources, alliances, and communication calibration to build execution routes.