markdown-review

Review markdown academic papers against CoPaper structure with seven checkers.

Updated Jun 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent --skill markdown-review-hjhnb-star
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: markdown-review
Source: https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent/tree/main/.agents/skills/markdown-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Hjhnb-star/ecr_grpo_agent --skill markdown-review-hjhnb-star

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users review and improve markdown academic paper content, ensuring adherence to the CoPaper GUI structure and maintaining high academic quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Review: Runs seven specialized checkers sequentially to validate all aspects of paper quality.
  • CoPaper Structure: Follows the CoPaper structure rules for optimal formatting and organization.
  • User Interaction: Provides read-only checker status and issue explanations for a designated reviewer subagent.

Quick Start

Use the markdown-review skill to review the content of 'paper.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about markdown-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a markdown academic paper for structure and quality?

To review a markdown academic paper, this Skill orchestrates seven specialized checkers sequentially to validate clarity, logical coherence, and technical depth based on CoPaper structure rules.

What is CoPaper structure compliance for markdown papers?

CoPaper structure compliance ensures your markdown academic paper follows specific formatting and organization rules, validating optimal layout and maintaining high academic quality through sequential checks.

Do I need any specific dependencies to run markdown compliance checks?

No external dependencies are required to run markdown compliance checks; the Skill operates independently using internal scripts and references to validate academic paper content.

Can I use automated checkers to improve markdown academic quality without manual reading?

Automated checkers improve markdown academic quality by providing read-only status reports and issue explanations for a designated reviewer subagent, requiring user interaction to record validation outputs.

What is the best way to ensure logical coherence in a research paper written in markdown?

The best way to ensure logical coherence is running comprehensive multi-checker reviews that validate technical depth and structural formatting sequentially against established academic paper guidelines.

Why does the markdown review process require user interaction during the checker sequence?

The markdown review process requires user interaction for status checks and output recording, allowing a designated reviewer to monitor the sequential validation stages and capture issue explanations accurately.