maturity-assessment

Assess CTI programme maturity across six dimensions with a structured scoring framework.

15|5|Updated Apr 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill maturity-assessment
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: maturity-assessment
Source: https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skills/tree/main/skills/maturity-assessment
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill maturity-assessment

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CTI teams lack a structured way to measure capability maturity and prioritise improvement.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Framework for six-dimension maturity scoring across collection, analysis, production, dissemination, management, and tooling.
  • Templates and guidance to benchmark current state and plan targeted enhancements for ongoing CTI programmes.
  • Use Case: A mature programme identifies gaps in tooling and governance to chart a path to higher capability.

Quick Start

Run a quick self-assessment to establish a baseline and identify top improvement priorities.

Frequently Asked Questions about maturity-assessment

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I assess CTI programme maturity across collection and analysis dimensions?

Benchmarking CTI maturity reveals actionable gaps in governance and tooling, guiding structured improvements for security operations teams to transition towards a higher capability target state.

What is the best way to benchmark current threat intelligence capabilities for targeted enhancements?

This six-dimension maturity scoring framework evaluates collection, analysis, production, dissemination, management, and tooling to establish a baseline and identify top improvement priorities.

Do I need PIR templates and stakeholder mapping to run a CTI maturity self-assessment?

Yes, a defined scoring framework, PIR templates, stakeholder mapping, and a self-assessment workflow are required to produce actionable maturity gaps and target-state recommendations.

How does a maturity assessment identify gaps in threat intelligence tooling and governance?

It scores capabilities across six dimensions against levels 1 to 5, charting a path to higher capability by highlighting specific tooling and governance gaps requiring targeted enhancements.

Can I use this maturity assessment for an established security operations team?

Yes, it applies to security operations and CTI teams seeking structured evaluation of ongoing programmes to establish a baseline and identify top improvement priorities.