skills.rest
maystudios
maystudiosCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

maxsim-simplify

Review changed code for reuse, quality, and efficiency improvements.

10|1|Updated Feb 24, 2026
Search Tags:#maintenance#quality#refactor#duplication#code-review#naming#simplify
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/maystudios/maxsimcli --skill maxsim-simplify
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: maxsim-simplify
Source: https://github.com/maystudios/maxsimcli/tree/main/templates/skills/maxsim-simplify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/maystudios/maxsimcli --skill maxsim-simplify

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviews changed code for reuse opportunities, quality issues, and efficiency improvements, then fixes actionable items.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Identify duplication and missed opportunities to use existing utilities.
  • Enforce clearer naming, reduce complexity, and remove dead or redundant code.
  • Use case: after implementing a feature, run this review to improve maintainability and performance.

Quick Start

Run the 3-pass analysis on touched files to remove duplication and improve maintainability.

Frequently Asked Questions about maxsim-simplify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for duplication and missed utility reuse?▼

To automate code review for duplication, run a structured three-pass analysis on touched files to identify missed utility reuse, quality issues, and efficiency improvements. This surfaces actionable fixes for deduplication and maintainability in changed code.

How do I refactor changed code to enforce clearer naming and remove dead code?▼

Refactor changed code by applying a quality-focused analysis pass that enforces clearer naming, reduces complexity, and identifies dead or redundant code to remove, ensuring maintainable outcomes across incremental feature changes.

What is the best way to improve maintainability after implementing a feature?▼

The best way to improve maintainability after implementing a feature is to run a three-pass review on touched files. This identifies duplication, missed utility reuse, and quality issues, applying actionable fixes for maintainable, faster software.

Can I use incremental code review on just the touched files in my codebase?▼

Yes, you can apply incremental code review specifically to touched files across a codebase. This focuses the three-pass analysis on changed code to surface reuse opportunities, quality issues, and efficiency improvements without reviewing the entire project.

Does automated code review work for finding efficiency improvements in changed code?▼

Yes, automated code review works for finding efficiency improvements by running an efficiency-focused analysis pass on changed code. It identifies performance issues alongside duplication and quality problems to ensure maintainable and faster software.

Why should I run a three-pass analysis for code maintenance instead of a general review?▼

A three-pass analysis separates maintenance concerns into Reuse, Quality, and Efficiency, ensuring structured and comprehensive coverage. Unlike a general review, it systematically surfaces actionable fixes for duplication, naming, and dead code removal.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
yoshisadayoshisada

kiln-coverage

Enforce an 80% line and branch coverage gate for changed files.

Community
Intermediate
knopkiknopki
1

boy-scout-rule

Guide incremental code improvements by removing dead code and fixing linting issues.

Community
Intermediate
Kushal9889Kushal9889

husky

Sets up Husky git hooks to automate code quality checks and testing before commits.

Community
Intermediate
jackmcintyrejackmcintyre

python-refactoring

Analyze Python code for complexity, duplication, and best practices.

Community
Intermediate