me-2

Score profiles using the ME-2 formula across P, C, D, and E dimensions.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow --skill me-2
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: me-2
Source: https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow/tree/main/c1.5/.claude/skills/me-2
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow --skill me-2

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

ME-2 scoring provides a structured, quantitative method to compare tradeoffs among profiles using the four dimensions P, C, D, and E.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Formula: (P + C + D + E) / 4
  • Dimensions: P (Completeness), C (Clarity), D (Differentiation), E (Economy)
  • Use Cases: quickly evaluate multiple profiles to inform decision-making, prioritization, and risk-aware tradeoffs.

Quick Start

Score profiles by applying the ME-2 formula to their P, C, D, E values and compare the resulting averages across options.

Frequently Asked Questions about me-2

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is ME-2 scoring for tradeoff analysis?

ME-2 scoring is a quantitative method to compare tradeoffs among profiles using the four dimensions P (Completeness), C (Clarity), D (Differentiation), and E (Economy). It averages these values to inform design, prioritization, and risk-aware strategy decisions.

How do I calculate scores using the ME-2 formula?

To calculate scores using the ME-2 formula, apply (P + C + D + E) / 4 to each profile. You need clear definitions for the P, C, D, and E dimensions and a consistent rubric to handle missing data and edge cases during evaluation.

When should I use dimension-based scoring for decision analysis?

Use dimension-based scoring for decision analysis when you need to quickly evaluate multiple profiles to inform prioritization and risk-aware tradeoffs. It is suited for scenarios where structured, quantitative comparisons across options are required.

What data do I need to provide for ME-2 profile evaluation?

For ME-2 profile evaluation, you must provide clear definitions for the P, C, D, and E dimensions. You also need a consistent rubric to handle missing data and edge cases across the options being scored.

Does ME-2 scoring work for prioritizing design options without external dependencies?

Yes, ME-2 scoring works without external dependencies to prioritize design options. It applies a self-contained formula to score profiles, requiring only clear dimension definitions and a consistent rubric to handle missing data and edge cases.