me-3

Score engineering payloads on completeness, clarity, accuracy, and implementability.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow --skill me-3
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: me-3
Source: https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow/tree/main/c1.5/.claude/skills/me-3
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gapfDev/workflow --skill me-3

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This ME-3 checkpoint defines a formal exit-scoring mechanism for the L88_ENGINEERING_PAYLOAD, enabling objective assessment of payload readiness by quantifying four dimensions: Completeness, Clarity, Accuracy, and Implementability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 4-dimension ME-3 scoring: evaluates P, C, A, and I to produce a single composite score.
  • Calibration anchors: provides explicit criteria and examples to ensure consistent scoring across teams.
  • HB Validation Gate integration: projects post-score status and gates further actions based on score thresholds.
  • Use Case: engineering teams can score payloads during B3 exit reviews to decide on release readiness.

Quick Start

Apply the ME-3 scoring model to the B3 exit of L88_ENGINEERING_PAYLOAD using P, C, A, and I, and compare results against the HB Validation Gate.

Frequently Asked Questions about me-3

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I score engineering payload readiness before release?

Score engineering payload readiness using the ME-3 model across four dimensions: Completeness, Clarity, Accuracy, and Implementability. This mechanism produces a single composite score to objectively assess readiness during B3 exit reviews.

What is payload exit scoring for quality assurance?

Payload exit scoring is a formal checkpoint mechanism that quantifies payload readiness through the ME-3 model. It evaluates four dimensions and applies calibration anchors to ensure consistent and objective quality assessments across engineering teams.

How do I apply calibration anchors for consistent payload scoring?

Apply calibration anchors by comparing your payload assessments against explicit criteria and examples provided by the ME-3 model. This ensures consistent scoring across teams by standardizing the evaluation of completeness, clarity, accuracy, and implementability.

How does the HB validation gate work with payload scoring?

The HB validation gate works by projecting post-score status and gating further actions based on score thresholds. After applying the ME-3 scoring model, the gate determines whether the engineering payload satisfies the required validation criteria for release.

Can I use this scoring model for B3 exit reviews?

Yes, you can use the ME-3 scoring model for B3 exit reviews to evaluate the L88_ENGINEERING_PAYLOAD. It enables engineering teams to decide on release readiness by quantifying completeness, clarity, accuracy, and implementability.

When do I need a formal exit-scoring mechanism for engineering payloads?

You need a formal exit-scoring mechanism when objective assessment of payload readiness is required before release. The ME-3 checkpoint quantifies four quality dimensions and applies an HB validation gate to ensure assessments meet end-to-end engineering standards.