meaning-review

Batch-review meaning index suggestions and auto-accept high-confidence changes.

1|Updated Jan 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bozaah/meaning-fs --skill meaning-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: meaning-review
Source: https://github.com/bozaah/meaning-fs/tree/main/.claude/skills/meaning-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bozaah/meaning-fs --skill meaning-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the time-consuming task of reviewing automated index suggestions and approving changes at scale, ensuring high accuracy while reducing manual effort.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Batch review: Automatically classify suggestions into auto-accept, recently added, and manual review groups.
  • Safe automation: Auto-accepts high-confidence changes (confidence ≥ 0.8) and notes any low-confidence items for human review.
  • Audit-ready outputs: Logs applied changes and validates index health after updates.

Quick Start

Run /meaning-review to batch-process index suggestions. Use /meaning-review --interactive to review low-confidence items manually.

Frequently Asked Questions about meaning-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I batch-review codebase index suggestions to reduce manual effort?

Batch-reviewing codebase index suggestions classifies automated changes into auto-accept, recently added, and manual review groups, auto-accepting high-confidence updates to reduce manual effort while flagging low-confidence items for human review.

What is metadata inference for codebase indexing and how does it work?

Metadata inference for codebase indexing automatically proposes intent updates, tag additions, and relationship mappings across files. Suggestions are generated with confidence scores, and changes meeting a high threshold are applied automatically to the index.

How do I auto-accept high-confidence index changes while keeping low-confidence items for manual review?

Auto-accepting high-confidence index changes requires a threshold-based flow where suggestions scoring above 0.8 are applied automatically, while lower-scoring items are categorized for manual review to ensure index accuracy and safety.

Can I interactively review low-confidence index suggestions instead of skipping them?

Interactively reviewing low-confidence index suggestions is supported by running the process with an interactive flag, letting you manually inspect and decide on items below the auto-accept threshold instead of leaving them unprocessed.

How do I validate index health after applying automated codebase updates?

Validating index health after applying automated codebase updates happens automatically post-batch, where the system logs all applied changes and runs a validation check to ensure the updated index remains consistent and accurate.

What is the best way to handle AI-driven codebase indexing at scale without losing accuracy?

Handling AI-driven codebase indexing at scale without losing accuracy relies on threshold-based batch processing, auto-accepting high-confidence metadata inferences while routing uncertain suggestions to a manual review queue for human oversight.