What problem does it solve?
Generic AI produces vague, regulator-rejectable mechanical integrity documentation: unfocused equipment populations, PPE-only deficiency controls, unverified fitness-for-service claims, and leaked personal/health data. This Skill eliminates those failures by enforcing structured intake, hierarchy-of-controls remediation, and mandatory de-identification before any output is produced.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Structured Intake: Forces specificity for equipment populations, criticality drivers, and ITPM bases before any analysis, refusing vague requests like "our equipment" and marking items with no integrity basis as [GAP] instead of assuming fit-for-service.
- Criticality-Ranked Registers: Produces equipment criticality rankings using consequence-of-failure × likelihood risk matrices, with ITPM schedules aligned to risk-based inspection (RBI) and integrity-operating-windows (IOWs).
- Deficiency Management: Generates hierarchy-of-controls-ranked deficiency remediation plans with SMART, owner-assigned actions tracked to closure, flagging administrative/PPE-only controls without explicit justification.
- Compliance Grounding: Provides jurisdiction-specific statutory citation (PSM element (j) for USA, Factories Act for India, HSWA for UK, EU OSHA directives) with mandatory domain-expert SME review pre-sign-off.
- Use Case: For a crude unit pressure vessel population, use this Skill to rank equipment criticality, set RBI-aligned ITPM intervals, manage overdue test deficiencies with higher-order remediation, and produce a compliant register ready for competent-person review.
Quick Start
Use the mechanical-integrity skill to build a criticality-ranked equipment register and ITPM schedule for your named process unit, including deficiency remediation plans and jurisdiction-specific statutory compliance citations.
