meddev-document-review

Review and draft medical device regulatory documents with prioritized findings and revision-ready comments.

1|Updated Jul 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HalseyYang/Skills-HY --skill meddev-document-review-halseyyang
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: meddev-document-review
Source: https://github.com/HalseyYang/Skills-HY/tree/main/meddev-document-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HalseyYang/Skills-HY --skill meddev-document-review-halseyyang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Medical device registration documents such as FDA submissions, EU MDR technical files, CERs, PMS/PMCF plans, and deficiency responses require expert-level review against regulations and standards, which is slow and error-prone when done manually. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Regulatory Document Review: Reviews 510(k) summaries, De Novo/PMA modules, Q-Sub packages, GSPR checklists, CERs, risk files, software/cybersecurity documentation, labeling, and IFUs against FDA, EU MDR, ISO 13485, and ISO 14971 expectations. - Prioritized Findings and Gap Analysis: Classifies issues as Critical, Major, or Minor with structured tables covering issue, regulatory impact, suggested revision, and evidence needed. - Revision-Ready Drafting: Rewrites weak claims into evidence-linked regulatory language and drafts deficiency response strategies with proposed response text. - Use Case: A consultant receives a draft PSUR and a Notified Body deficiency letter; the skill audits the PSUR against Article 86 and MDCG 2022-21, then drafts point-by-point responses with supporting evidence references. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review your attached FDA 510(k) summary or MDR technical documentation section and return prioritized comments with suggested revisions.

Frequently Asked Questions about meddev-document-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a medical device FDA submission document?

Provide the document or excerpt and identify the submission type, such as 510(k), De Novo, PMA, or Q-Sub. The review checks predicate rationale, performance testing, software, cybersecurity, and labeling consistency, then returns prioritized findings with suggested revisions.

What documents can be checked against EU MDR 2017/745?

The review covers MDR Annex II and III technical documentation, GSPR checklists, classification rationale under Annex VIII, CERs, PMCF plans, PMS plans, PSURs, labeling, and IFUs. Findings cite specific articles and MDCG guidance such as MDCG 2022-21 and MDCG 2025-10.

How are review findings prioritized in regulatory document review?

Findings are classified as Critical for likely submission blockers or unsupported safety claims, Major for probable reviewer questions or weak evidence linkage, and Minor for wording or formatting issues. Each finding includes why it matters and a suggested revision.

Can it help respond to FDA deficiency letters or reviewer questions?

Yes. It restates each question, identifies the root issue, proposes a response strategy, drafts response text, and lists supporting attachments or evidence needed. The same pattern applies to Notified Body questions under EU MDR.

Does the review require access to external knowledge bases?

Public regulations and standards are the primary basis, but the skill can optionally search configured Tencent ima medical-device knowledge bases using a Python script with IMA_OPENAPI_CLIENTID and IMA_OPENAPI_APIKEY credentials. Knowledge-base results are treated as supporting references, not controlling authority.

What are the limitations of automated regulatory document review?

The review does not fabricate standards clauses, guidance text, or study findings, and flags uncertainty when source documents are not supplied. It supports but does not replace formal conformity assessment, Notified Body audits, or legal regulatory advice.