Coordinate multi-agent dialogue sessions with user-steered agendas and synthesized discussion threads.
npx skills add https://github.com/tyevans/tackline --skill meeting-tyevans
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: meeting Source: https://github.com/tyevans/tackline/tree/main/skills/workflows/meeting Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tyevans/tackline --skill meeting-tyevans
This Skill addresses the challenge of gathering diverse viewpoints and facilitating productive discussions on complex topics, ensuring all angles are considered before decisions are made.
Use the meeting skill to discuss whether we should use event sourcing or CQRS-lite for the new billing module.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Multi-perspective dialogues are facilitated by simulating interactive panel discussions where agents play specific roles to debate a topic. This approach manages agent roles and conversation flow to explore topics from diverse viewpoints before decisions are made.
Pressure-testing a design decision is best done by assembling agents with opposing roles, such as an Architect and a Skeptic, to debate pros and cons. This perspective synthesis gathers arguments from opposing viewpoints for decision-making.
Yes, you can steer the conversation flow in real-time during an agent dialogue session. The user-driven agenda steering allows you to guide the discussion, ask follow-ups, and pivot topics while agents coordinate via direct messages.
Yes, this multi-agent dialogue approach works for clarifying complex software engineering requirements by coordinating agent communication and synthesizing discussion threads. It ensures all angles are considered when hashing out design decisions like choosing event sourcing or CQRS-lite.
You should not use simulated panel discussions when a single expert perspective suffices or when immediate, unilateral decisions are required without gathering diverse viewpoints. It is designed for complex topics requiring multiple angles before making decisions.
NirusanFacilitate structured brainstorming sessions and create a product brief.
domenhribernikInterrogate plans one question at a time to surface assumptions and track decision-tree dependencies.
2300031147Analyze software architectures and decisions to produce engineering reviews.
tmalcolm-0607Run structured multi-agent adversarial debates with configurable formats and verdict generation.
