meow:plan-eng-review

Plan engineering reviews with risk assessment, ASCII diagrams, and prioritized TODOs.

14|2|Updated Mar 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ngocsangyem/MeowKit --skill meow-plan-eng-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: meow:plan-eng-review
Source: https://github.com/ngocsangyem/MeowKit/tree/main/.claude/skills/meow%3Aplan-eng-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ngocsangyem/MeowKit --skill meow-plan-eng-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Plan Eng Review helps teams validate architecture decisions, guarantee alignment on scope, and surface risks before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured design critique and risk assessment for architecture, code quality, tests, and performance.
  • Step-by-step review workflow with telemetry, plan outputs, and actionable TODOs.
  • Use cases include reviewing a new feature design, a major refactor, or architectural changes across teams.

Quick Start

Run /meow:plan-eng-review to start an engineering review on the current branch.

Frequently Asked Questions about meow:plan-eng-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I plan an engineering review for architecture decisions before implementation?

Plan an engineering review by validating architecture decisions, code quality, tests, and performance. Generate a structured plan file, ASCII diagrams, and a prioritized TODO list to ensure alignment and surface risks before implementation begins.

What should an engineering design review cover for a major code refactor?

An engineering design review for a major refactor should cover architecture changes, code quality, test coverage, and performance. It produces a clear plan file with risk assessment and actionable TODOs to guide developers through the implementation.

How do I conduct a code review on a branch to assess performance risks?

Conduct a code review on a branch by analyzing architecture decisions, code quality, tests, and performance. The review process outputs ASCII diagrams, a plan file, and a prioritized TODO list to assess risks and verify the design before implementation.

Can I use an engineering review to verify test coverage and code quality for new features?

Yes, use an engineering review to verify test coverage and code quality for new features. The review workflow evaluates architecture decisions and performance, producing a structured plan file with risk assessment and a prioritized TODO list for developers.

What is the best way to document architecture decisions and risk assessment for a design doc?

Document architecture decisions and risk assessment by running a structured engineering review. It generates a clear plan file containing risk evaluation, ASCII diagrams for architecture, and a prioritized TODO list to ensure actionable implementation steps.

Does an engineering design review work for cross-team architectural changes?

Yes, an engineering design review works for cross-team architectural changes. It applies to branches and design docs, providing structured design critique, risk assessment, and a prioritized TODO list to align scope across teams before implementation.