merge-conflict-resolution

To resolve git merge conflicts, identify the conflict context from merges, rebases, or cherry-picks, enumerate conflicted files, and apply per-file resolution strategies. This approach handles source code, tests, documentation, and lockfiles systematically.

Handling merge conflicts in lockfiles and documentation requires selecting targeted per-file resolution strategies based on conflict type. This ensures minimal-risk changes that preserve semantic integrity while stabilizing the branch state.

Yes, after resolving merge conflicts, you can run relevant validations to prevent semantic regressions. The workflow validates the final state by checking per-file changes and logging outcomes before continuing with the branch operation.

Git merge conflict resolution fails during rebases and cherry-picks when conflict types are not properly identified and per-file strategies are mismatched. Enumerating conflicted files and applying guided workflows for code, tests, and docs stabilizes the process.

Yes, git conflict resolution applies to update-branch failures and cherry-pick conflicts by detecting the conflict context, selecting appropriate resolution strategies per file, and validating the final state to ensure safe continuation.

Guiding per-file conflict resolution for source code and tests involves identifying the conflict type, enumerating conflicted files, selecting a minimal-risk strategy, performing changes, and running validations to prevent semantic regressions.