meta-rubric-gen

Generate atomic YAML evaluation rubrics with integer points and negative constraints.

6|Updated Mar 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/slowman2084/meta-agent --skill meta-rubric-gen
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: meta-rubric-gen
Source: https://github.com/slowman2084/meta-agent/tree/main/source/skills/meta-rubric-gen
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/slowman2084/meta-agent --skill meta-rubric-gen

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Generate precise, atomic, and machine-readable evaluation rubrics for grading single test-case LLM outputs, ensuring objective, MECE coverage and explicit negative constraints to prevent hallucinations and unsafe recommendations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Atomic Criteria: Transforms a single user input into mutually exclusive, testable rubric items that yield yes/no judgments.
  • Safety & Negative Constraints: Enforces 1–2 mandatory negative items for hallucinations, dangerous advice, or policy violations and ensures penalty budgets.
  • Domain Context Retrieval: Optionally incorporates agent-specific references and MCP/tool capabilities to produce fact-first checks.
  • YAML Output & Validation: Emits YAML-formatted rubrics with integer points and runs structural checks (MECE, penalty budget).
  • Use Case: Auto-generate judge rubrics for medical advice, code generation, legal summaries, or content-moderation testcases.

Quick Start

Generate an atomic YAML rubric for a single test case by providing the case Input and optional agent_name plus must_follow notes.

Frequently Asked Questions about meta-rubric-gen

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate atomic evaluation rubrics for LLM outputs?

Generate atomic evaluation rubrics by transforming a single LLM test-case input into mutually exclusive, testable YAML items that yield objective yes/no judgments. This ensures verifiable, MECE coverage for grading model responses.

What is the best way to enforce safety constraints in LLM-as-a-judge rubrics?

Enforce safety constraints in LLM-as-a-judge rubrics by applying mandatory negative items for hallucinations and dangerous advice. The rubric generator allocates specific penalty budgets to prevent unsafe recommendations and policy violations.

How to create MECE test-case scoring criteria in YAML format?

Create MECE test-case scoring criteria in YAML format by emitting rubric lists with integer points and running structural checks. This validates mutually exclusive coverage and verifies penalty budget limits for single test-case LLM outputs.

Can I use domain-specific references to build fact-first evaluation rubrics?

You can use domain-specific references to build fact-first evaluation rubrics by incorporating agent-specific references and MCP tool capabilities. This enables context-aware checks for specialized domains like medical, coding, and legal.

Does the rubric generator support automated checks for medical and legal LLM outputs?

The rubric generator supports automated checks for medical and legal LLM outputs by producing objective, test-case-level evaluation criteria. It applies to internal workflows across these domains to ensure safety-aware and verifiable grading.

Why do my LLM evaluation rubrics fail to prevent hallucinations effectively?

LLM evaluation rubrics fail to prevent hallucinations when they lack explicit negative constraints. Generating atomic rubrics with 1-2 mandatory negative items and penalty budgets ensures hallucinations and policy violations are systematically penalized.