metodologia-disaster-recovery

Disaster recovery planning maps per-system RPO/RTO targets to tiered failover strategies, producing executable runbooks with roles, contacts, procedures, and escalation paths. It aligns your recovery objectives with Business Impact Analysis to minimize downtime.

Failover design patterns range from active-active for immediate recovery to pilot light for minimal pre-provisioned resources. Your choice depends on per-system RPO/RTO targets, with warm standby and active-passive offering intermediate recovery speed and cost balances.

Recovery runbooks document step-by-step procedures, assign roles and contacts, and define escalation paths for incident response. They integrate BIA alignment and traceable evidence tagging to ensure executable business continuity during failures.

Disaster recovery planning includes generating DR and test calendars for critical systems. You can schedule tabletop exercises and failover tests against defined RPO/RTO targets to validate runbook effectiveness and tiered failover readiness.

You need a defined DR strategy for your system, including identified critical systems and Business Impact Analysis data. This establishes the RPO/RTO targets and tier classification required to generate runbooks and testing calendars.

BIA alignment ensures your recovery objectives match business priorities. It drives per-system RPO/RTO enforcement and failover design selection, producing traceable evidence tagging that validates your DR plan meets continuity requirements.