mg-leadership-team

Coordinate executive decisions and code-review approvals across CEO, CTO, and Eng Dir perspectives.

1|1|Updated Feb 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wonton-web-works/miniature-guacamole --skill mg-leadership-team
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: mg-leadership-team
Source: https://github.com/wonton-web-works/miniature-guacamole/tree/main/src/framework/skills/mg-leadership-team
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wonton-web-works/miniature-guacamole --skill mg-leadership-team

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Coordinates executive perspectives (CEO, CTO, Eng Dir) to align strategic decisions, enable clear workstream planning, and accelerate code-review approvals, reducing bottlenecks and miscommunication.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Executive alignment: Facilitate business, technical, and operational perspectives in a single decision flow.
  • Workstream orchestration: Break initiatives into clear, testable workstreams with ownership and acceptance criteria.
  • Decision discipline: Produce clear outcomes (APPROVED / CHANGES) and actionable next steps.
  • Delegation and spawns: Spawn specialized agents (e.g., mg-build, deployment-engineer) to execute or review work.
  • Output consistency: Generate standardized executive reviews and delegation plans for cross-team coordination.

Quick Start

In your first session, invoke mg-leadership-team to initiate strategic planning for a new initiative and outline the initial workstreams.

Frequently Asked Questions about mg-leadership-team

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate strategic decisions across executive stakeholders in software projects?

Strategic decision coordination aligns executive perspectives by applying a triad of CEO, CTO, and Engineering Director views to planning and reviewing initiatives, producing actionable workstreams and clear delegation guidance.

How do I break down software initiatives into testable workstreams with clear ownership?

Workstream orchestration divides initiatives into testable units by generating executive reviews that define specific ownership assignments and acceptance criteria, ensuring clear accountability for downstream execution.

Can I use executive review to accelerate code-review approvals and reduce bottlenecks?

Executive review accelerates code-review approvals by enforcing a triad decision-making perspective, outputting standardized APPROVED or CHANGES outcomes with actionable steps to unblock teams and reduce miscommunication.

What is the best way to align business, technical, and operational perspectives before planning a new initiative?

Aligning business, technical, and operational perspectives requires a decision flow that enforces a triad perspective, facilitating executive alignment and generating standardized reviews before orchestrating new workstreams.

Does strategic planning work without spawning specialized agents to execute or review work?

Strategic planning can function without specialized agents, but spawning agents like mg-build or deployment-engineer enables direct execution and review of delegated workstreams based on the generated plan.

Why does executive alignment fail to produce clear outcomes during code reviews?

Executive alignment fails when decision discipline is lacking, but applying a triad perspective enforces clear APPROVED or CHANGES outcomes and generates actionable next steps for cross-team coordination.