microservices-patterns

To decompose a monolith into microservices, you identify bounded contexts to establish clear service boundaries, define data ownership, and structure inter-service communication. This enables independent deployment and scalable distributed systems.

The best way to ensure resilience in distributed systems is applying patterns like circuit breakers, retries, bulkheads, and sagas. These techniques prevent cascading failures and maintain reliability across event-driven microservices architectures.

You need an event-driven architecture for inter-service communication when building distributed systems that require decoupled data ownership and asynchronous processing. It enables independent services to react to events without tight API coupling.

To define API contracts and data ownership in a microservices architecture, you establish clear service boundaries within bounded contexts. This ensures each service maintains autonomous control over its specific data schema.

Yes, you can use the saga pattern to manage distributed transactions across microservices. Sagas coordinate multi-step processes across service boundaries, ensuring data consistency without relying on global database transactions.

Limitations of decomposing an application into bounded contexts include increased complexity in defining inter-service communication and managing distributed data ownership. Careful boundary identification is required to avoid tight coupling between services.