mid-flight

Write gamma-clarification.md to a cycle branch to signal live-source re-reads.

8|Updated Feb 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/usurobor/cnos --skill mid-flight
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: mid-flight
Source: https://github.com/usurobor/cnos/tree/main/src/packages/cnos.handoff/skills/handoff/mid-flight
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/usurobor/cnos --skill mid-flight

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This declarative guide defines the mid-flight rescue channel used to pin load-bearing changes on a cycle's artifact channel, preventing silent re-pins and enabling auditable recovery when α/β are mid-flight.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Writes a gamma-clarification.md entry to the cycle branch before side-channel edits, producing a cache-bust signal via the cycle-branch SHA transition.
  • Forces in-flight readers to re-fetch live sources (issue body, origin/main specs) and adjust work scope accordingly.
  • Provides a bounded, four-path resumption protocol (continue, re-scope, stop/escalate, or continue under protest) to maintain coherence.

Quick Start

Create or append to .cdd/unreleased/{N}/gamma-clarification.md on the cycle branch before issuing an issue edit or a main spec push.

Frequently Asked Questions about mid-flight

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent silent overwrites when pushing changes to an in-flight cycle branch?

To prevent silent overwrites during an in-flight cycle branch push, pin a gamma-clarification.md entry to the branch first. This creates a cache-bust signal via the cycle-branch SHA transition, forcing downstream readers to re-fetch live sources before proceeding.

What is the best way to signal a mid-flight scope change to concurrent workers?

Signaling a mid-flight scope change requires writing a gamma-clarification.md artifact on origin/cycle/{N} before any issue edits. This auditable signal forces in-flight workers to discard cached state, re-read live sources, and adjust their work scope accordingly.

How do I handle a mid-flight rescue without losing in-flight work?

Handling a mid-flight rescue without losing work involves using a bounded four-path resumption protocol: continue, re-scope, stop/escalate, or continue under protest. This maintains coherence while recording resumption guidance for subsequent actions.

When do I need a gamma-clarification file for a cycle branch handoff?

You need a gamma-clarification file for a cycle branch handoff when pinning a load-bearing change mid-flight. It must be placed on origin/cycle/{N} before any main pushes to serve as the finite, auditable signal for in-flight α/β workers to wake up and re-fetch live sources.

Can I edit an issue body directly while α/β workers are mid-flight on a cycle branch?

You should not edit an issue body directly while workers are mid-flight on a cycle branch without first creating a gamma-clarification.md file. This mid-flight rescue channel entry prevents silent re-pins and enables auditable recovery by enforcing a canonical wake-up via SHA transition.

What are the limitations of using a cycle-branch SHA transition for mid-flight fixes?

A limitation of using a cycle-branch SHA transition for mid-flight fixes is that it requires strict ordering: the gamma-clarification.md must be appended to .cdd/unreleased/{N}/ before any side-channel edits or main spec pushes, otherwise the cache-bust signal fails to wake in-flight readers.