midnight-verify:verify-tooling

Classify CLI tooling claims and route verification to CLI execution or source investigation.

37|9|Updated Feb 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/devrelaicom/midnight-expert --skill midnight-verify-verify-tooling
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: midnight-verify:verify-tooling
Source: https://github.com/devrelaicom/midnight-expert/tree/main/plugins/midnight-verify/skills/verify-tooling
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/devrelaicom/midnight-expert --skill midnight-verify-verify-tooling

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill reduces ambiguity when verifying claims about the Compact CLI by classifying claim types and selecting the authoritative verification method (CLI execution or source investigation), preventing misrouting and wasted effort.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Claim classification: Map statements about flags, output structure, error messages, exit codes, version reporting, installation, and CLI-vs-compiler distinctions to a verification strategy.
  • Method routing: Prefer CLI execution for behavioral claims and source investigation for internal or architectural claims, with support for concurrent dispatch when both are relevant.
  • Use Case: When asked whether a flag changes compilation output or whether an error message is produced, route the claim to a CLI tester to run commands and to a source investigator for internal explanations as needed.

Quick Start

Use this skill to classify the claim "the compact CLI exits with code 1 on syntax errors" and route it to CLI execution or source investigation as appropriate.

Frequently Asked Questions about midnight-verify:verify-tooling

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify CLI tooling claims about flags and exit codes?

Verify CLI tooling claims by classifying the statement type and routing behavioral assertions to a CLI execution tester that runs commands and inspects stdout, stderr, and exit codes, while routing architectural claims to source investigation methods.

What is the best way to test if a Compact CLI error message comes from the compiler or the CLI?

The best way to determine if an error message stems from the CLI or the compiler is to classify the claim and concurrently dispatch both a CLI execution tester to capture the output and a source investigator to trace the internal origin.

When do I need to use source investigation versus CLI execution for verification?

You need source investigation when verifying internal or architectural claims about Compact CLI behaviors, whereas CLI execution is preferred for behavioral claims about flags, output structure, error messages, and exit codes.

Can I check Compact CLI version reporting and installation methods without running the tool?

You can check version reporting and installation method claims by dispatching a source investigator to examine the codebase internally, though running the CLI execution tester provides direct verification of reported version strings and filesystem artifacts.

Why does my CLI claim verification route to the wrong testing method?

CLI claim verification routes incorrectly when claim classification fails to distinguish between behavioral claims requiring CLI execution and architectural claims requiring source investigation, leading to misrouting and wasted effort.