mine.audit

Audit codebases to rank issues by impact using Git and linters.

1|Updated Feb 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/NodeJSmith/Claudefiles --skill mine-audit
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: mine.audit
Source: https://github.com/NodeJSmith/Claudefiles/tree/main/skills/mine.audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/NodeJSmith/Claudefiles --skill mine-audit

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill identifies and ranks critical issues within a codebase, such as aging code, brittle designs, and missing tests, to help developers prioritize their efforts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Codebase Health Assessment: Performs a systematic audit to surface significant problems.
  • Prioritized Findings: Ranks issues by their potential impact on development and stability.
  • Use Case: Before starting a major refactor, use this Skill to get a clear, prioritized list of the most problematic areas in the codebase, ensuring you focus on what matters most.

Quick Start

Run a full audit of the current codebase.

Frequently Asked Questions about mine.audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit a codebase to identify technical debt and brittle designs?

A codebase health audit identifies and ranks critical issues by impact, including aging code, brittle designs, and missing tests. It analyzes code structure, dependencies, test coverage, and historical Git changes to synthesize prioritized findings for actionable refactoring.

What is the best way to prioritize code refactoring efforts before a major rewrite?

Prioritizing refactoring requires a systematic code audit that ranks issues by potential impact on stability and development. This approach surfaces the most problematic areas, ensuring developers focus efforts on what matters most.

How does a code audit use Git history and linters to assess maintainability?

A code audit assesses maintainability by analyzing historical changes using Git and running linters to evaluate code structure. This combination identifies aging code and missing tests, synthesizing the findings into a prioritized report for actionable next steps.

Can I use this code review process to generate actionable next steps like ADR creation?

Yes, a systematic code audit synthesizes prioritized findings into actionable next steps, suggesting refactoring, ADR creation, or issue filing. This directly addresses identified technical debt and missing tests.

Does codebase health assessment work without dependencies or external environment setup?

Codebase health assessment works without external dependencies, relying on internal scripts and references. It analyzes the existing codebase structure, dependencies, test coverage, and historical Git changes directly to produce a prioritized report.