mine.grill

Conduct risk assessment on proposed features by asking focused, adaptive questions from product, design, engineering, scope, and adversarial perspectives. This context-aware interrogation checks existing documents to skip answered questions, generating targeted questions and a structured brief for handoff.

The best way to evaluate a proposed feature and narrow scope is through targeted interrogation that identifies hidden assumptions and risks. By probing the idea from multiple perspectives, you produce a concise, structured feature brief consumable by downstream specify and build workflows.

Generate a structured feature brief from a raw idea by interrogating it with context-aware, multi-angle questioning. This process skips already answered questions by checking provided documents, yielding a targeted brief with actionable next-step options like challenge, specify, or build.

Multi-angle questioning works effectively for pre-pipeline exploration and feature planning by applying adversarial lenses to surface unanswered questions. It grounds the conversation in existing patterns and produces a structured brief consumable by downstream specify and build workflows.

You should not use adversarial questioning for product ideation when your idea is already fully specified and ready for build, as this process targets pre-pipeline exploration. It is designed to interrogate raw ideas to surface assumptions and risks before committing to design or engineering work.