mini-design-review

Automated design document verification compares your DESIGN file against repository rules and guidelines. It identifies discrepancies and applies defined checks for constitution compliance before generating a structured review verdict.

A constitution-aligned design review validates that your design document adheres to the repository's governance rules and quality standards. It checks for compliance, new function additions, and correct usage of existing functions within a single review cycle.

To perform a quality-check on a lightweight SDD design doc, the Skill reads your FEATURE_DIR to locate design artifacts. It applies rule-based checks for compliance and function usage, then writes the automated verdict to review-result.md.

Yes, the automated design review workflow tracks iterations by writing the number of review attempts to FEATURE_DIR/design-review-times.md. It halts further processing entirely if the maximum configured review attempts are reached.

Yes, this is specifically built for design review of minimal SDD-generated documents. It provides a deterministic, rule-based workflow to ensure alignment with project constitution and development guidelines before final acceptance.

When the design review reaches the maximum attempts limit, it halts further processing to prevent infinite loops. The final structured review outcome remains safely stored in the FEATURE_DIR/review-result.md file.