mini-implement-review

To validate code implementation against design documents, run automated checks that compare the minimal SDD code to the detailed DESIGN artifacts, enforcing design presence and recording functional, constitutional, and hygiene review results.

A minimal SDD code review is an automated validation process that checks generated code against detailed design specifications. It tracks implement-review iterations and enforces functional, constitutional, and hygiene checks to ensure implementation consistency.

Track design verification iterations by running structured reviews that log each implement-review cycle. This records functional, constitutional, and hygiene check results across revisions for traceability and continuous quality improvement.

No, automated checks for code review require a DESIGN artifact to exist. The review process enforces the presence of the detailed design document to compare the minimal SDD implementation against and validate consistency.

A key limitation when validating minimal SDD implementations is the requirement for a pre-existing DESIGN artifact. Without this detailed design document, automated checks cannot compare the implementation or enforce structural and hygiene consistency.