minimum-controllable-technology-point

Maps perceptible experience parameters to TRIZ-based technology breakthrough points and patent layouts.

Updated Aug 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MeerkatAIChina/meerkat-skills-activity --skill minimum-controllable-technology-point-meerkataichina
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: minimum-controllable-technology-point
Source: https://github.com/MeerkatAIChina/meerkat-skills-activity/tree/main/skills/minimum-controllable-technology-point
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MeerkatAIChina/meerkat-skills-activity --skill minimum-controllable-technology-point-meerkataichina

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Product teams often develop technology disconnected from user needs, scatter R&D resources across too many technical points, and build weak patent portfolios. This Skill bridges user-perceptible experience and technology strategy by systematically deriving the minimum controllable technology point (TSCP triad: technical means, benefit, control mechanism) that deserves focused investment. ## Core Features & Use Cases - 9-Step Derivation Workflow: Traces from perceptible experience parameters through function, principle, technical parameters, and technical problems down to the minimum controllable technology point, technical solution, evolution path, roadmap, and patent layout. - TRIZ Integration: Applies the TRIZ contradiction matrix, 40 inventive principles, and technology evolution trends to design solutions and plan technology roadmaps. - Quantified Scoring & Validation: Scores each technology point on benefit value, control strength, and complexity, with a self-consistency checklist covering all 10 output fields. - Use Case: Given a high-speed hair dryer concept targeting 3-minute drying with low noise, the Skill outputs a 10-field table identifying the magnetic-levitation motor as the core technology point, four TRIZ-based solution options, a 24-month phased R&D plan, and a defensive patent cluster strategy. ## Quick Start Analyze the minimum controllable technology point for my product concept, deriving the experience parameters, TRIZ-based technical solutions, technology roadmap, and patent layout from my product and user insight inputs.

Frequently Asked Questions about minimum-controllable-technology-point

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify the minimum controllable technology point for a product?

Start from a quantified perceptible experience parameter, then derive functions, underlying scientific principles, and measurable technical parameters. Identify the TRIZ contradiction blocking those parameters, and extract the smallest indivisible unit combining technical means, user benefit, and control mechanism.

What is the TSCP triad in technology planning?

TSCP stands for the triad of technical means (object, method, parameters), benefit (perceiver, dimension, intensity), and control mechanism (barrier type, strength, protection scope). It is the smallest strategic unit of technology innovation that cannot be split without breaking the mapping or protection.

How does TRIZ apply to product technology roadmapping?

TRIZ contributes the contradiction matrix for framing technical problems, 40 inventive principles for designing solutions, and evolution trends such as dynamization and system completeness for plotting multi-stage technology paths. The Skill maps current state to an evolution scale and plans phased R&D milestones.

What inputs does this technology analysis require?

It requires product name, category, target users, and core experience goals. User interview insights, existing technical information such as patents or competitor technologies, and constraints like cost or timeline are optional but improve output quality.

When should I not use a minimum technology point analysis?

Avoid it when the product has no user-perceptible differentiation goal, since the method anchors technology to perceptible experience parameters. It is also unsuitable for pure cost-reduction projects where no technical barrier or patent strategy is needed.