moai-domain-humanize

Detect and remove AI tells from generated text while preserving meaning, facts, and figures.

Updated Jul 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jjjh7401/AI-Lighting_Console --skill moai-domain-humanize-jjjh7401
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: moai-domain-humanize
Source: https://github.com/jjjh7401/AI-Lighting_Console/tree/main/.claude/skills/moai-domain-humanize
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jjjh7401/AI-Lighting_Console --skill moai-domain-humanize-jjjh7401

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? AI-generated text carries recognizable patterns — formulaic connectors, inflated significance, cliché openers, and template structures — that make it read as machine-written. This Skill post-edits (윤문) such text to read as human-authored without changing what it says, across Korean, English, Japanese, and Chinese. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multilingual tell catalogues: Per-language detection categories for prose and marketing copy, each with severity tiers (S1/S2/S3) and before/after rewrite examples in the target language. - Meaning-preservation machinery: An Invariant Ledger anchors facts, identifiers, numbers, and caveats before editing; a Delta Audit verifies survival after editing and forces rollback on any drift. - Dual grading and guardrails: Prose mode grades A/B/C/D with 30%/50% over-editing change-rate gates; copy mode replaces the change-rate guard with a fact-anchor preservation guard for headlines, CTAs, and landing pages. - Genre modules: Display-copy rules for landing pages and slide decks, plus a review-only QA-gate pipeline that detects formulaic copy and proposes fixes without auto-applying them. - Use Case: Paste an AI-drafted English blog post and receive a humanized version plus a change report listing the tell categories hit, the quality grade, and the estimated percent changed. ## Quick Start Humanize this AI-generated Korean marketing copy and report which tell categories were removed and the final quality grade.

Frequently Asked Questions about moai-domain-humanize

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make AI-generated text sound human?▼

Run a humanization pass that detects catalogued AI tells — formulaic connectors, cliché openers, inflated significance — and rewrites only the flagged spans. This Skill supports Korean, English, Japanese, and Chinese with per-language tell catalogues and severity-based removal thresholds.

What AI writing tells should I look for when editing?▼

Common tells include mechanical transition stacking, rule-of-three tricolons, vague attribution like "experts argue", forced uplifting endings, and formatting abuse such as excessive bold. Each tell carries a severity tier: S1 tells are removed on first occurrence, S2 at three or more instances.

Does AI text humanization work for Korean, Japanese, and Chinese?▼

Yes, the Skill ships dedicated modules for Korean, English, Japanese, and Chinese, each with language-native prose and copy-layer catalogues. Copy tells do not transfer mechanically between languages, so each module applies its own rules and examples.

Can humanizing text change its meaning or facts?▼

No — meaning preservation is the top rule. An Invariant Ledger records facts, numbers, names, and caveats before editing, and a post-edit Delta Audit rolls back any edit that alters a supplied item. Any meaning-distortion flag forces the lowest quality grade.

What are the limitations of automated AI-text detectors?▼

Automated detectors are unreliable across these four languages, especially on CJK polite registers where they false-positive on correct formal writing. This Skill is a pattern-based editing tool that relies on catalogued tell categories and clustering, not on a detector's verdict.

When should I use review-only mode instead of rewriting?▼

Use the copy-review QA gate when copy came from another tool or workflow and must be reviewed before application. It detects formulaic copy, proposes at least three alternatives per finding, and never auto-applies changes — accepted fixes then flow through the standard rewrite mode.